Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937466›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Storing and managing water for the environment is more efficient than mimicking natural flows.

Sarah E Null, Harrison Zeff, Jeffrey Mount, Brian Gray, Anna M Sturrock, Gokce Sencan, Kristen Dybala, Barton Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah E NullDepartment of Watershed Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA. sarah.null@usu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7451-7908
Harrison ZeffDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jeffrey MountWater Policy Center, Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Brian GrayWater Policy Center, Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anna M SturrockSchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9423-9845
Gokce SencanWater Policy Center, Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kristen DybalaPoint Blue Conservation Science, Petaluma, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2787-4600
Barton ThompsonStanford Law School & Doerr School of Sustainability, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dams and reservoirs are often needed to provide environmental water and maintain suitable water temperatures for downstream ecosystems. Here, we evaluate if water allocated to the environment, with storage to manage it, might allow environmental water to more reliably meet ecosystem objectives than a proportion of natural flow. We use a priority-based water balance operations model and a reservoir temperature model to evaluate 1) pass-through of a portion of reservoir inflow versus 2) allocating a portion of storage capacity and inflow for downstream flow and stream temperature objectives. We compare trade-offs to other senior and junior priority water demands. In many months, pass-through flows exceed the volumes needed to meet environmental demands. Storage provides the ability to manage release timing to use water efficiently for environmental benefit, with a co-benefit of increasing reservoir storage to protect cold-water at depth in the reservoir.

Identifiers

PMID38937466
PMCPMC11211385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.