Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937451›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Efficient removal of nanoplastics from industrial wastewater through synergetic electrophoretic deposition and particle-stabilized foam formation.

Amna Abdeljaoued, Beatriz López Ruiz, Yikalo-Eyob Tecle, Marie Langner, Natalie Bonakdar, Gudrun Bleyer, Patrik Stenner, Nicolas Vogel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Parametric study on electro-coagulation for efficient removal of microplastics from reverse osmosis wastewater.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amna AbdeljaouedParticle Processing, Process Technology & Engineering, Evonik Operations GmbH, Rodenbacher Chaussee 4, 63457, Wolfgang, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5964-8325
Beatriz López RuizParticle Processing, Process Technology & Engineering, Evonik Operations GmbH, Rodenbacher Chaussee 4, 63457, Wolfgang, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9669-4910
Yikalo-Eyob TecleParticle Processing, Process Technology & Engineering, Evonik Operations GmbH, Rodenbacher Chaussee 4, 63457, Wolfgang, Germany.
Marie LangnerParticle Processing, Process Technology & Engineering, Evonik Operations GmbH, Rodenbacher Chaussee 4, 63457, Wolfgang, Germany.
Natalie BonakdarInstitute of Particle Technology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstrasse 4, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7273-3704
Gudrun BleyerInstitute of Particle Technology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstrasse 4, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Patrik StennerParticle Processing, Process Technology & Engineering, Evonik Operations GmbH, Rodenbacher Chaussee 4, 63457, Wolfgang, Germany.
Nicolas VogelInstitute of Particle Technology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstrasse 4, 91058, Erlangen, Germany. nicolas.vogel@fau.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9831-6905

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) Project-ID 416229255 - SFB 1411EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 860720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microplastic particles have been discovered in virtually all ecosystems worldwide, yet they may only represent the surface of a much larger issue. Nanoplastics, with dimensions well below 1 µm, pose an even greater environmental concern. Due to their size, they can infiltrate and disrupt individual cells within organisms, potentially exacerbating ecological impacts. Moreover, their minute dimensions present several hurdles for removal, setting them apart from microplastics. Here, we describe a process to remove colloidally stable nanoplastics from wastewater, which synergistically combines electrophoretic deposition and the formation of particle-stabilized foam. This approach capitalizes on localized changes in particle hydrophilicity induced by pH fluctuations resulting from water electrolysis at the electrode surface. By leveraging these pH shifts to enhance particle attachment to nascent bubbles proximal to the electrode, separation of colloidal particles from aqueous dispersions is achieved. Using poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) colloidal particles as a model, we gain insights into the separation mechanisms, which are subsequently applied to alternative model systems with varying surface properties and materials, as well as to real-world industrial wastewaters from dispersion paints and PMMA fabrication processes. Our investigations demonstrate removal efficiencies surpassing 90%.

Identifiers

PMID38937451
PMCPMC11211448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.