Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937408›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2024

Position dependence of recovery coefficients in

Julian Leube, Wies Claeys, Johan Gustafsson, Maikol Salas-Ramirez, Michael Lassmann, Michel Koole, Johannes Tran-Gia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reply to "High Quantitative Accuracy Is Possible withJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Quantitative accuracy ofEJNMMI physics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Quantitative SPECT/CT: Technique and Clinical Applications.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julian LeubeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, Würzburg, 97080, Germany. Leube_J@ukw.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1849-5860
Wies ClaeysDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Johan GustafssonMedical Radiation Physics Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, 221 85, Sweden.
Maikol Salas-RamirezDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, Würzburg, 97080, Germany.
Michael LassmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, Würzburg, 97080, Germany.
Michel KooleDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Johannes Tran-GiaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, Würzburg, 97080, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the importance of quantitative SPECT has increased tremendously due to newly developed therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals, there are still no accreditation programs to harmonize SPECT imaging. Work is currently underway to develop an accreditation for quantitative

methodsUsing a low-dose CT of a SPECT/CT acquisition, a computerized version of the NEMA body phantom was created using a semi-automatic threshold-based method. Based on the mass-density map, the detector orbit, and the sphere centers, realistic SPECT acquisitions of all possible 720 sphere configurations of both the PET and the SPECT versions of the NEMA Body Phantom were generated using Monte Carlo simulations. SPECT reconstructions with different numbers of updates were performed without (CASToR) and with resolution modeling (STIR). Recovery coefficients were calculated for all permutations, reconstruction methods, and phantoms, and their dependence on the sphere positioning was investigated. Finally, the simulation-based findings were validated using SPECT/CT acquisitions of six different sphere configurations.

resultsOur analysis shows that sphere positioning has a significant impact on the recovery for both of the reconstruction methods and the phantom type. Although resolution modeling resulted in significantly higher recovery, the relative variation in recovery within the 720 permutations was even larger. When examining the extreme values of the recovery, reconstructions without resolution modeling were influenced primarily by the sphere position, while with resolution modeling the volume of the two adjacent spheres had a larger influence. The SPECT measurements confirmed these observations, and the recovery curves showed good overall agreement with the simulated data.

conclusionOur study shows that sphere positioning has a significant impact on the recovery obtained in NEMA sphere phantom measurements and should therefore be considered in a future SPECT accreditation. Furthermore, the single-measurement method normally performed for PVC should be reconsidered to account for the position dependency.

Indexed as

177Lu SPECT/CTAccreditationHarmonizationMonte Carlo simulationQuantitative SPECT/CTRecovery coefficientsSPECT

Identifiers

PMID38937408
PMCPMC11211301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.