Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937403›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2024

Efficacy and Safety of BP02 (Trastuzumab Biosimilar) in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Phase III Study.

M V T Krishna Mohan, Arpitkumar Prajapati, Rushabh Kothari, Srikrishna Mandal, Ranganatha Rao Srikanth, Rajnish Nagarkar, Shriram Khane, Ayyagari Santa, Disha Dadke

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies for cancer treatment in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M V T Krishna MohanBasavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Arpitkumar PrajapatiCuraTeQ Biologics Private Limited, Unit XVII, SyNo. 77&78, Indrakaran (v), Sangareddy Dist, Hyderabad, 502329, India. Arpitkumar.Prajapati@curateqbio.com.
Rushabh KothariNarayana Multispecialty Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Srikrishna MandalRadiotherapy Department, NRS Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India.
Ranganatha Rao SrikanthMNJ Institute of Oncology and Regional Cancer Centre, Hyderabad, India.
Rajnish NagarkarHCG Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India.
Shriram KhaneRST Regional Cancer Centre, Nagpur, India.
Ayyagari SantaBasavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Disha DadkeCuraTeQ Biologics Private Limited, Unit XVII, SyNo. 77&78, Indrakaran (v), Sangareddy Dist, Hyderabad, 502329, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveTrastuzumab targets human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptors and is indicated for treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. BP02, a recombinant IgG1 kappa humanized monoclonal antibody, is being developed as a trastuzumab biosimilar. The objective of this study was to evaluate the equivalence of BP02 with reference trastuzumab (RT: Herceptin

methodsThis double-blinded, 1:1 randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled, phase III equivalence trial recruited women aged 18-75 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed HER2- positive, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer with systemic metastasis, from 59 sites in India. Patients were randomly allocated 1:1 stratified by estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor status to receive BP02/RT (8-mg/kg loading dose on day 1-cycle 1, 6 mg/kg on day 1-cycles 2-8, of each 3-week cycle) combined with docetaxel (75 mg/m

resultsBetween 23 September, 2020 and 16 September, 2022, 690 patients were recruited (n = 345 each to BP02/RT). At the end of the induction phase (intent-to-treat population), a similar proportion of patients achieved an objective response rate with BP02 (n = 231 [67.0%], 95% confidence interval [CI] 62.0, 71.9) and RT (n = 238 [69.0%], 95% CI 64.1, 73.9). The 95% CI of risk difference (-2.03, 95% CI -9.15, 5.09) and 90% CI of risk ratio (0.97, 90% CI 0.89, 1.06) were within equivalence margins of ± 13% and (0.80, 1.25), respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal were reported in 2.9% and 3.2% patients with BP02 and RT, respectively.

conclusionsBP02 showed an equivalent efficacy and similar safety profile to RT at the end of 24 weeks. CLINICAL

trial registrationCTRI Number: CTRI/2020/04/024456.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumabAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDocetaxelDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndiaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsDocetaxelERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID38937403
PMCPMC11263219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.