ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2024
Factors Correlated with Anticoagulation Choice in Primary Care Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and High Stroke Risk.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Definition of Polypharmacy in Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter: A Scoping Review.Cardiology research · 2026Review
- Oral anticoagulant prescribing and DOAC dosing appropriateness in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study from Vietnam.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe available data on anticoagulation therapy in real-world primary care settings for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk of stroke is limited.
objectiveTo evaluate anticoagulation therapy and elucidate the factors associated with the selection between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin. DESIGN AND
participantsThis is a retrospective cohort study that included patients ≥ 18 years old at a large primary care outpatient group, a network of twenty clinics in the northeast United States between January 4, 2021 - January 4, 2023. MAIN MEASURES: Oral anticoagulation therapy in AF patients with high risk of stroke (CHA KEY
resultsAmong the 3,118 adult patients with AF and high risk of stroke (median age 77.90, IQR 71.66-84.50 years; male 57.6%), we found that older age (aOR 1.40, p = 0.003), greater BMI (25-29.9: aOR 1.32, p = 0.048; ≥ 30 aOR 1.42, p = 0.010), and taking more than five medications (aOR 2.28, p < 0.001) were more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant. Among those taking an OAC, having Medicare as the sole coverage (aOR 0.53, p = 0.032), male gender (aOR 0.69, p = 0.011), worse renal function (aOR 0.80, p = 0.021), and higher CHA
conclusionsAF with high stroke risk adult patients are more likely to be on an oral anticoagulant if they are older, having BMI ≥ 25, or taking more than five medications. Medicare as the sole coverage, male gender, worse renal function, and higher CHA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.