Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937344›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Detection and Localization of Spine Disorders from Plain Radiography.

İlkay Yıldız Potter, Diana Yeritsyan, Edward K Rodriguez, Jim S Wu, Ara Nazarian, Ashkan Vaziri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

İlkay Yıldız PotterBioSensics, LLC, 57 Chapel Street, Newton, MA, 02458, USA. ilkay.yildiz@biosensics.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2827-7672
Diana YeritsyanBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Carl J. Shapiro Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Stoneman 10, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Edward K RodriguezBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Carl J. Shapiro Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Stoneman 10, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Jim S WuDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham (MGB), Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Ara Nazarian *Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Carl J. Shapiro Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Stoneman 10, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Ashkan Vaziri *BioSensics, LLC, 57 Chapel Street, Newton, MA, 02458, USA.

Funding

Software Platform for Automatic, Opportunistic Screening of Vertebral Compression FracturesR44AG084327 · NIA · BIOSENSICS, LLC · PI NAZARIAN, ARA, VAZIRI, ASHKAN · 2023 to 2025
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS R44 AG084327NIA NIH HHS R44AG084327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spine disorders can cause severe functional limitations, including back pain, decreased pulmonary function, and increased mortality risk. Plain radiography is the first-line imaging modality to diagnose suspected spine disorders. Nevertheless, radiographical appearance is not always sufficient due to highly variable patient and imaging parameters, which can lead to misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. Employing an accurate automated detection model can alleviate the workload of clinical experts, thereby reducing human errors, facilitating earlier detection, and improving diagnostic accuracy. To this end, deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tools have significantly outperformed the accuracy of traditional CAD software. Motivated by these observations, we proposed a deep learning-based approach for end-to-end detection and localization of spine disorders from plain radiographs. In doing so, we took the first steps in employing state-of-the-art transformer networks to differentiate images of multiple spine disorders from healthy counterparts and localize the identified disorders, focusing on vertebral compression fractures (VCF) and spondylolisthesis due to their high prevalence and potential severity. The VCF dataset comprised 337 images, with VCFs collected from 138 subjects and 624 normal images collected from 337 subjects. The spondylolisthesis dataset comprised 413 images, with spondylolisthesis collected from 336 subjects and 782 normal images collected from 413 subjects. Transformer-based models exhibited 0.97 Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) in VCF detection and 0.95 AUC in spondylolisthesis detection. Further, transformers demonstrated significant performance improvements against existing end-to-end approaches by 4-14% AUC (p-values < 10

Indexed as

Deep LearningAdultDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleFractures, CompressionHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiographyROC CurveSpinal DiseasesSpinal FracturesSpineSpondylolisthesisDeep learningPlain radiographySpine disorderSpondylolisthesisVertebral compression fracture

Identifiers

PMID38937344
PMCPMC11612062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.