ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Comparison of
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Head-to-head comparison of fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPI) radiopharmaceuticals and [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative Performance ofWorld journal of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- The comparative diagnostic and therapeutic application value of FAPI PET/CT andFrontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Emerging Radiopharmaceuticals Beyond FDG for Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Advances in Nuclear Medicine.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- FAPI radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear oncology and theranostics of solid tumours: are we nearer to surrounding the hallmarks of cancer?Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Beyond fluorodeoxyglucose: Molecular imaging of cancer in precision medicine.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study assesses the diagnostic performance of
methodsSeventy-nine ovarian cancer patients who performed
resultsAmong all patients, 6 were assessed for initial assessment and 73 for recurrence and metastasis detection. For all lesions,
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
38937339What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.