Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937329›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2025

A budget impact analysis of a digital monitoring solution in patients treated with oral anticancer agents: a medico-economic analysis of the randomized phase 3 CAPRI trial.

Etienne Minvielle, Henri Leleu, Marc Masseti, Arlindo Ferreira, Gérard de Pouvourville, Mario Di Palma, Florian Scotté

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Etienne MinvielleGustave Roussy, Division of Interdisciplinary Patient Care Pathways (DIOPP), Villejuif, France.
Henri LeleuPublic health expertise, 10 boulevard de Sébastopol, Paris, 75004, France. henri.leleu@ph-expertise.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4930-6767
Marc MassetiPublic health expertise, 10 boulevard de Sébastopol, Paris, 75004, France.
Arlindo FerreiraResilience, Paris, France.
Gérard de PouvourvilleESSEC Business School, Cergy-Pontoise, France.
Mario Di PalmaGustave Roussy, Division of Interdisciplinary Patient Care Pathways (DIOPP), Villejuif, France.
Florian ScottéGustave Roussy, Division of Interdisciplinary Patient Care Pathways (DIOPP), Villejuif, France.

Funding

Resilience, France
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesRemote patient monitoring (RPM) has demonstrated numerous benefits in cancer care, including improved quality of life, overall survival, and reduced medical resource use. This study presents a budget impact analysis of a nurse navigator-led RPM program, based on the CAPRI trial, from the perspective of the French national health insurance (NHI). The study aimed to assess the impact of the program on medical resource utilization and costs.

methodsMedical resource utilization data were collected from both medico-administrative sources and patient-reported questionnaires. Costs were calculated by applying unit costs to resource utilization and estimating the average monthly cost per patient. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore different perspectives and varying resource consumption.

resultsThe analysis included 559 cancer patients participating in the CAPRI program. From the NHI perspective, the program resulted in average savings of €377 per patient over the 4.58-month follow-up period, mainly due to reduced hospitalizations. The all-payers perspective yielded even greater savings of €504 per patient. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the findings.

conclusionThe budget impact analysis demonstrated that the CAPRI RPM program was associated with cost savings from the perspective of the NHI. The program's positive impact on reducing hospitalizations outweighed the additional costs associated with remote monitoring. These findings highlight the potential economic benefits of implementing RPM programs in cancer care. Further research is warranted to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness and scalability of such programs in the real-world settings.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAdministration, OralAgedBudgetsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisCost SavingsFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntineoplastic AgentsBudget impact analysisCancer careCost savingsMedical resource utilizationRemote patient monitoring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.