Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937303›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Differential diagnosis of cystic and nodular lung diseases].

Maximilian Güttlein, Lena Wucherpfennig, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Monika Eichinger, Claus Peter Heußel, Mark O Wielpütz

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maximilian GüttleinKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Lena WucherpfennigKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Hans-Ulrich KauczorKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Monika EichingerKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Claus Peter HeußelKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Mark O WielpützKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. mark.wielpuetz@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCystic and nodular lung diseases encompass a broad spectrum of diseases with different etiologies and clinicoradiological presentations. Their differentiation is crucial for patient management but can be complex due to diseases with features of both categories and overlapping radiological patterns.

objectiveThis study aims to describe the imaging features of cystic and nodular lung diseases in high-resolution computed tomography (CT) in detail-primarily based on their etiology-in order to allow a more accurate differential diagnosis of these diseases. MATERIALS AND

methodsA narrative review based on current literature on the topic was conducted from a clinicoradiological perspective.

resultsThis paper systematically categorizes the differential diagnosis of cystic and nodular lung disease and provides insights into their radiological patterns and etiologies. It highlights the role of CT in the diagnosis of these diseases and emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary panels combining expertise from radiology, pulmonology, rheumatology, and pathology.

conclusionReliable differential diagnosis of cystic and nodular lung diseases, particularly based on their radiological features alone, remains difficult due to their overlapping and dynamic nature. Multidisciplinary boards should be the clinical standard for accurate work-up of these diseases, as they combine the medical history, symptoms, radiological findings, and, if necessary, histopathological examinations, thus providing a more robust framework for diagnosis and management.

Indexed as

CystsLung DiseasesTomography, X-Ray ComputedDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansComputed tomographyLung diseases, interstitialMorphologyPulmonary cystsPulmonary nodule

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.