ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Differential diagnosis of cystic and nodular lung diseases].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCystic and nodular lung diseases encompass a broad spectrum of diseases with different etiologies and clinicoradiological presentations. Their differentiation is crucial for patient management but can be complex due to diseases with features of both categories and overlapping radiological patterns.
objectiveThis study aims to describe the imaging features of cystic and nodular lung diseases in high-resolution computed tomography (CT) in detail-primarily based on their etiology-in order to allow a more accurate differential diagnosis of these diseases. MATERIALS AND
methodsA narrative review based on current literature on the topic was conducted from a clinicoradiological perspective.
resultsThis paper systematically categorizes the differential diagnosis of cystic and nodular lung disease and provides insights into their radiological patterns and etiologies. It highlights the role of CT in the diagnosis of these diseases and emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary panels combining expertise from radiology, pulmonology, rheumatology, and pathology.
conclusionReliable differential diagnosis of cystic and nodular lung diseases, particularly based on their radiological features alone, remains difficult due to their overlapping and dynamic nature. Multidisciplinary boards should be the clinical standard for accurate work-up of these diseases, as they combine the medical history, symptoms, radiological findings, and, if necessary, histopathological examinations, thus providing a more robust framework for diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38937303What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.