Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937271›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

An opportunity to be grateful for? Exploring discourses about international medical graduates from India and Pakistan to the UK between 1960 and 1980.

Zakia Arfeen, Brett Diaz, Cynthia Ruth Whitehead, Mohammed Ahmed Rashid

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zakia ArfeenUCL, London, UK z.arfeen@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1647-6172
Brett DiazThe Wilson Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2274-3860
Cynthia Ruth WhiteheadThe Wilson Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0134-9074
Mohammed Ahmed RashidUCL, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8443-1240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFollowing India and Pakistan gaining independence from British colonial rule, many doctors from these countries migrated to the UK and supported its fledgling National Health Service (NHS). Although this contribution is now widely celebrated, these doctors often faced hardship and hostility at the time and continue to face discrimination and racism in UK medical education. This study sought to examine discursive framings about Indian and Pakistani International Medical Graduates (IPIMGs) in the early period of their migration to the UK, between 1960 and 1980.

methodsWe assembled a textual archive of publications relating to IPIMGs in the UK during this time period in

resultsThe dominant discourse in this archive was one of opportunity. This included the opportunity for training, which was not available to IPIMGs in an equitable way, the missed opportunity to frame IPIMGs as saviours of the NHS rather than 'cheap labour', and the opportunity these doctors were framed to be held by being in the 'superior' British system, for which they should be grateful. Notably, there was also an opportunity to oppose, as IPIMGs challenged notions of incompetence directed at them.

conclusionAs IPIMGs in the UK continue to face discrimination, we shed light on how their cultural positioning has been historically founded and engrained in the imagination of the British medical profession by examining discursive trends to uncover historical tensions and contradictions.

Indexed as

Foreign Medical GraduatesHistory, 20th CenturyHumansIndiaPakistanRacismState MedicineUnited KingdomGlobal HealthHealth education and promotionOther study design

Identifiers

PMID38937271
PMCPMC11216068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.