Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937181›Full record

ArticleVaccine2024

Antibody-mediated immunological memory correlates with long-term Lyme veterinary vaccine protection in mice.

Maria de la Paz Gutierrez, Annalisa B Huckaby, Evita Yang, Kelly L Weaver, Joshua M Hall, Matthew Hudson, Spencer R Dublin, Emel Sen-Kilic, Carleena M Rocuskie-Marker, Sarah Jo Miller and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Modification ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Maria de la Paz GutierrezDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA; Vaccine Development Center, West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Annalisa B HuckabyDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA; Vaccine Development Center, West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Evita YangDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA; Vaccine Development Center, West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Kelly L WeaverDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA; Vaccine Development Center, West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Joshua M HallDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA; Vaccine Development Center, West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Matthew HudsonDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA; Vaccine Development Center, West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Spencer R DublinDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA; Vaccine Development Center, West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Emel Sen-KilicDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA; Vaccine Development Center, West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Carleena M Rocuskie-MarkerDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA; Vaccine Development Center, West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Sarah Jo MillerDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA; Vaccine Development Center, West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Christopher L PritchettCollege of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Manjula P MummadisettiAVM Biomed, Pottstown, PA, USA.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Timothy DriscollDepartment of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Mariette BarbierDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA; Vaccine Development Center, West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, USA. Electronic address: mabarbier@hsc.wvu.edu.

Funding

Peptide-vaccine development against Lyme disease SupplementR01AI152219 · NIAID · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI BARBIER, MARIETTE · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
Cell and Molecular Biology Training Program at West Virginia UniversityT32GM133369 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Zoica Cerasela Dinu, MICHAEL D SCHALLER · 2019 to 2026
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI152219NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM133369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lyme disease, caused by the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, is the most common tick-borne illness in the United States. Despite the rise in Lyme disease incidence, there is no vaccine against B. burgdorferi approved for human use. Little is known about the immune correlates of protection needed to prevent Lyme disease. In this work, a mouse model was used to characterize the immune response and compare the protection provided by two USDA-approved vaccines for use in canines: Duramune (bacterin vaccine) and Vanguard crLyme (subunit vaccine composed of two outer surface proteins, OspA and OspC). C3H/HeNCrl mice were immunized with two doses of either Duramune or Vanguard, and immune responses and protection against B. burgdorferi were assessed in short (35 days) and long-term (120 days) studies. Flow cytometry, ELISPOT detection of antibody-producing cells, and antibody affinity studies were performed to identify correlates of vaccine-mediated protection. Both vaccines induced humoral responses, with high IgG titers against B. burgdorferi. However, the levels of anti-B. burgdorferi antibodies decayed over time in Vanguard-vaccinated mice. While both vaccines triggered the production of antibodies against both OspA and OspC, antibody levels against these proteins were also lower in Vanguard-vaccinated mice 120 days post-vaccination. Both vaccines only provided partial protection against B. burgdorferi at the dose used in this model. The protection provided by Duramune was superior to Vanguard 120 days post-vaccination, and was characterized by higher antibody titers, higher abundance of long-lived plasma cells, and higher avidity antibodies than Vanguard. Overall, these studies provide insights into the importance of the humoral memory response to veterinary vaccines against Lyme disease and will help inform the development of future human vaccines.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialBorrelia burgdorferiImmunoglobulin GImmunologic MemoryLyme DiseaseLyme Disease VaccinesMice, Inbred C3HAnimalsAntibody AffinityAntigens, BacterialAntigens, SurfaceBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial VaccinesDisease Models, AnimalEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayFemaleAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialAntigens, SurfaceBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial VaccinesImmunoglobulin GLipoproteinsLyme Disease VaccinesOspA proteinOspC proteinVaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID38937181
PMCPMC12399139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.