Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937104›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2024

Identification of Gaps in Quality of Care and Good Practice Interventions in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Insights From a Literature Review and Qualitative Study of Nine Centers in North America.

Jeffrey R Curtis, Vivian P Bykerk, Mary K Crow, Maria I Danila, Boulos Haraoui, George A Karpouzas, Eric D Newman, Hillary Norton, Jeff Peterson, Carter Thorne and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jeffrey R CurtisUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8907-8976
Vivian P BykerkHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Mary K CrowHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7881-2020
Maria I DanilaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9246-6200
Boulos HaraouiInstitut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
George A KarpouzasHarbor-University of California, Los Angeles, Medical Center, Torrance, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1065-1563
Eric D NewmanGeisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, ELAN Consulting Company, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Hillary NortonSanta Fe Rheumatology, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Jeff PetersonWestern Washington Medical Group, Everett, Washington.
Carter ThorneCentre of Arthritis Excellence and The Arthritis Program Research Group, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada.
Grace C WrightGrace C. Wright, MD, PC, New York, New York.
Lorna BainSouthlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada (current affiliation: Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada).

Funding

Regeneron PharmaceuticalsSanofi
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveQuality of care (QoC) delivery in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continues to suffer from various challenges (eg, delay in diagnosis and referral) that can lead to poor patient outcomes. This study aimed to identify good practice interventions that address these challenges in RA care in North America.

methodsThe study was conducted in three steps: (1) literature review of existing publications and guidelines (April 2005 to April 2021) on QoC in RA; (2) in-person visits to >50 individual specialists and health care professionals across nine rheumatology centers in the United States and Canada to identify challenges in RA care and any corresponding good practice interventions; and (3) collation and organization of findings of the two previous methods by commonalities to identify key good practice interventions, followed by further review by RA experts to ensure key challenges and gaps in RA care were captured.

resultsSeveral challenges and eight good practice interventions were identified in RA care. The interventions were prioritized based on the perceived positive impact on the challenges in care and ease of implementation. High-priority interventions included the use of technology to improve care, streamlining specialist treatment, and facilitating comorbidity assessment and care. Other interventions included enabling patient access to optimal medication regimens and improving patient self-management strategies.

conclusionLearnings from the study can be implemented in other rheumatology centers throughout North America to improve RA care. Although the study was completed before the COVID-19 pandemic, the findings remain relevant.

Identifiers

PMID38937104
PMCPMC11506565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.