Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38936971›Full record

ArticleBMJ supportive & palliative care2024

Regional hospice and palliative care networks worldwide: scoping review.

Hanna A A Röwer, Franziska A Herbst, Sven Schwabe

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Challenges and good practices of regional hospice and palliative care networks in Germany: Results of an online survey].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanna A A RöwerInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany roewer.hanna@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9680-7969
Franziska A HerbstInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2602-9277
Sven SchwabeInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3575-3817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegional hospice and palliative care networks (RHPCNs) are increasingly being established to improve integrative care for patients with life-limiting illnesses. This scoping review aimed at identifying and synthesising international literature on RHPCNs, focusing on structures, outcomes, benefits, success factors and good practices.

methodFollowing Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework, a search of four electronic databases (CINAHL, Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection) was conducted on 7 July 2023. Additionally, a manual search of reference lists of the identified articles was performed. Original research, qualification theses and descriptive reports on RHPCNs at a structural level were included.

findingsTwo researchers analysed 777 article abstracts, screened 104 full texts and selected 24 articles. The included studies predominantly used qualitative designs. RHPCNs self-identify as local stakeholders, employ coordination offices and steering committees, and actively recruit network partners. Outcomes included improved professional practices, enhanced quality of care, increased patient utilisation of regional care offerings and improved patient transitions between care providers. Success factors included clear coordination, transparent communication, strategic planning and resource-securing strategies.

conclusionsThe analysis identified key RHPCN success factors such as effective communication and adaptive leadership. Despite the need for further research, the findings emphasise RHPCNs' potential to improve palliative care and encourage policymaker support. OTHER: This scoping review is part of the research project HOPAN, which aims at assessing and analysing RHPCNs in Germany. The project is funded by the German Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) (Grant N° 01VSF22042; funding period: 01/2023-12/2024).

Indexed as

Hospice CarePalliative CareHumansCase ManagementCommunicationHospice carePalliative CareSupportive care

Identifiers

PMID38936971
PMCPMC12171468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.