Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38936959›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2024

Budgeting and Advocacy to Improve Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene in Health Care Facilities: A Case Study in Nepal.

Laxman Kharal Chettry, Prakash Bohara, Ramesh C Bohara, Ramhari Rijal, Sarad Khadha, Hari Subedi, Debesh Giri, Sarbesh Sharma, Upendra Dhungana, Matteus van der Valen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Determinants of access to waste management services in healthcare facilities in 14 low- and middle-income countries.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laxman Kharal ChettryTerre des hommes Foundation, Nepal Country Office, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Prakash BoharaTerre des hommes Foundation, Nepal Country Office, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Ramesh C BoharaSwiss Water and Sanitation Consortium, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ramhari RijalThakurbaba Municipality, Nepal.
Sarad KhadhaGeruwa Rural Awareness Association, Gulariya Municipality, Nepal.
Hari SubediGeruwa Rural Awareness Association, Gulariya Municipality, Nepal.
Debesh GiriGeruwa Rural Awareness Association, Gulariya Municipality, Nepal.
Sarbesh SharmaManagement Division, Department of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Upendra DhunganaManagement Division, Department of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Matteus van der ValenHelvetas, Zurich, Switzerland.
John BroganHelvetas, Zurich, Switzerland.
Darcy M AndersonThe Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. darcy.anderson@unc.edu.

Funding

Biostatstics for Research in Environmental HealthT32ES007018 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel, Rebecca Fry · 1985 to 2026
$31.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Barriers to achieving and sustaining access to water, sanitation, hygiene, cleaning, and waste management (WASH) in health care facilities include a lack of supportive policy environment and adequate funding. While guidelines exist for assessing needs and making initial infrastructure improvements, there is little guidance on how to develop budgets and policies to sustain WASH services. We conducted costing and advocacy activities in Thakurbaba municipality, Nepal, to develop a budget and operations and maintenance policy for WASH in health care facilities in partnership with the municipal government. Our objectives for this study were to (1) describe the process and methods used for costing and advocacy, (2) report the costs to achieve and maintain basic WASH services in the 8 health care facilities of Thakurbaba municipality, and (3) report the outcomes of advocacy activities and policy development. We applied bottom-up costing to enumerate the resources necessary to achieve and maintain basic WASH services and their costs. The annual costs to achieve, operate, and maintain basic access to WASH services ranged from US$4881-US$9695 per facility. Cost findings were used to prepare annual budgets recommended to achieve, operate, and maintain basic services, which were presented to the municipal government and incorporated into an operations and maintenance policy. To date, the municipality has adopted the policy and established a recovery fund of US$3831 for repair and maintenance of infrastructure and an additional US$153 per facility for discretionary WASH spending, which were to be replenished as they were spent. Advocacy at the national level for WASH in health care facilities is currently being championed by the municipality, and findings from this project have informed the development of a nationally costed plan for universal access. This study is intended to provide a roadmap for how cost data can be collected and applied to inform policy.

Indexed as

BudgetsHealth FacilitiesHygieneSanitationWater SupplyHumansNepalWaste Management

Identifiers

PMID38936959
PMCPMC11216704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.