ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Clinicopathologic Significance of Quaking Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RNA-binding protein quaking: a multifunctional regulator in tumour progression.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimThe RNA binding protein quaking (QKI) is associated with the development and progression of tumor suppressors in various cancers. However, the clinical implications of QKI expression have not yet been fully elucidated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of QKI expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed QKI, Zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1), E-cadherin, and glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) immunohistochemical staining on 166 HCC patient tissue samples. X-tile bioinformatics software was used to set the cut-off value for high QKI expression. Correlations between QKI expression and various clinicopathological parameters were assessed.
resultsThe best cut-off value for high QKI expression was 12.5. High QKI expression was observed in 28 of 166 patients (16.9%) and was an independent prognostic factor for inferior recurrence-free survival (RFS). In addition, high ZEB1 and GPX4 expression correlated with high QKI expression, but not with the loss of E-cadherin expression.
conclusionHigh QKI expression was identified in HCCs and associated with poor RFS. QKI might be a prognostic biomarker of HCCs associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and a potential candidate therapeutic target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.