ReviewIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Personalizing Prophylactic Radiotherapy for Hip Heterotopic Ossification: An AMSTAR-2 Compliant Review of Meta-analyses.
Review in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimHeterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty. Various prophylactic treatments have been proposed, including radiotherapy (RT). This review summarizes the evidence from meta-analyses on the efficacy of RT in preventing hip HO. MATERIALS AND
methodsA literature search was conducted on PubMed. The quality of the meta-analyses was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool.
resultsSeven meta-analyses were included. One meta-analysis reported a significant reduction in HO occurrence after RT compared to the control group. Comparing RT and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, one and two meta-analyses showed significantly greater efficacy of RT in preventing severe HO and better outcomes in patients receiving drugs, respectively. Regarding RT settings, the postoperative and preoperative RT were each supported by one meta-analysis. Furthermore, two meta-analyses showed an advantage of multi-fractionated RT over single fraction RT. The overall confidence rate of the meta-analyses was moderate, low, and critically low in one, three, and three meta-analyses, respectively.
conclusionRT is a confirmed prophylactic intervention for HO. However, the precise optimization of timing, dosage, and fractionation requires elucidation. Future research should focus on the development of predictive models through large-scale data collection and advanced analytics to refine individualized treatment strategies and assess RT comparative effectiveness with drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.