Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38936565›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2024

Privacy-preserving model evaluation for logistic and linear regression using homomorphically encrypted genotype data.

Seungwan Hong, Yoolim A Choi, Daniel S Joo, Gamze Gürsoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seungwan HongDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013, USA.
Yoolim A ChoiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013, USA.
Daniel S JooNew York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013, USA; Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Gamze GürsoyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013, USA; Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: gamze.gursoy@columbia.edu.

Funding

Tools to Address the Challenges of Preserving Privacy in Sharing and Analysis of Biomedical DataR35GM147004 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GURSOY, GAMZE · 2022 to 2025
$1.8M
Realistic quantification of potential privacy loss from genomic summary resultsR00HG010909 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GURSOY, GAMZE · 2022 to 2024
$727k
SERGEANT: SEcuRe GEnome Analysis competitionR13HG009072 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2016 to 2019
$65k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG010909NHGRI NIH HHS R13 HG009072NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM147004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLinear and logistic regression are widely used statistical techniques in population genetics for analyzing genetic data and uncovering patterns and associations in large genetic datasets, such as identifying genetic variations linked to specific diseases or traits. However, obtaining statistically significant results from these studies requires large amounts of sensitive genotype and phenotype information from thousands of patients, which raises privacy concerns. Although cryptographic techniques such as homomorphic encryption offers a potential solution to the privacy concerns as it allows computations on encrypted data, previous methods leveraging homomorphic encryption have not addressed the confidentiality of shared models, which can leak information about the training data.

methodsIn this work, we present a secure model evaluation method for linear and logistic regression using homomorphic encryption for six prediction tasks, where input genotypes, output phenotypes, and model parameters are all encrypted.

resultsOur method ensures no private information leakage during inference and achieves high accuracy (≥93% for all outcomes) with each inference taking less than ten seconds for ∼200 genomes.

conclusionOur study demonstrates that it is possible to perform linear and logistic regression model evaluation while protecting patient confidentiality with theoretical security guarantees. Our implementation and test data are available at https://github.com/G2Lab/privateML/.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityGenotypeAlgorithmsConfidentialityDatabases, GeneticHumansLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsPhenotypePrivacyGenotype–phenotype associationHomomorphic encryptionPrivacy-enhancing technologies

Identifiers

PMID38936565
PMCPMC11272436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.