Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38936551›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2024

Weight Velocity in Addition to Latest Weight Does Not Improve the Identification of Wasting or the Prediction of Stunting and Mortality: A Longitudinal Analysis Using Data from Malawi, South Africa, and Pakistan.

Charlotte M Wright, Fanny Petermann-Rocha, Ruth Bland, Per Ashorn, Shakila Zaman, Frederick K Ho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charlotte M WrightSchool of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. Electronic address: charlotte.wright@glasgow.ac.uk.
Fanny Petermann-RochaCentro de Investigación Biomédica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile.
Ruth BlandSchool of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Per AshornCenter for Child Health Research, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Shakila ZamanDepartment of Public Health, University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Frederick K HoSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn low/middle-income countries, most nutritional assessments use the latest weights, without reference to growth trajectory.

objectivesThis study explores whether velocity, in addition to the latest weight, improves the prediction of wasting, stunting, or mortality in the first 2 years of life.

methodsWe analyzed a combined data set with weight and height data collected monthly in the first year of 3447 children from Pakistan, Malawi, and South Africa, with height and survival recorded till 24 m. The main exposures were weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) at the end of each 2-m period and weight velocity-for-age z-score (WVZ

resultsChildren who were already stunted or wasted were most likely to remain so. Higher WVZ

conclusionsThe key anthropometric determinant of impending wasting, stunting, and mortality appears to be how far below the normal range the child's weight is, rather than how they reached that position.

Indexed as

Body WeightGrowth DisordersWasting SyndromeBody HeightChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMalawiMalePakistanProportional Hazards ModelsSouth Africachildrengrowth disordersmortalitystuntingweight

Identifiers

PMID38936551
PMCPMC11375462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.