ArticleMedical image analysis2024
Anatomically plausible segmentations: Explicitly preserving topology through prior deformations.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semi-Supervised Structural Prior-Guided Network for Space Target Component Segmentation in ISAR Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Normative growth trajectories of fetal brain regions validated by satisfactory maturation of neurodevelopmental domains at 2 years of age.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the rise of deep learning, new medical segmentation methods have rapidly been proposed with extremely promising results, often reporting marginal improvements on the previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) method. However, on visual inspection errors are often revealed, such as topological mistakes (e.g. holes or folds), that are not detected using traditional evaluation metrics. Incorrect topology can often lead to errors in clinically required downstream image processing tasks. Therefore, there is a need for new methods to focus on ensuring segmentations are topologically correct. In this work, we present TEDS-Net: a segmentation network that preserves anatomical topology whilst maintaining segmentation performance that is competitive with SOTA baselines. Further, we show how current SOTA segmentation methods can introduce problematic topological errors. TEDS-Net achieves anatomically plausible segmentation by using learnt topology-preserving fields to deform a prior. Traditionally, topology-preserving fields are described in the continuous domain and begin to break down when working in the discrete domain. Here, we introduce additional modifications that more strictly enforce topology preservation. We illustrate our method on an open-source medical heart dataset, performing both single and multi-structure segmentation, and show that the generated fields contain no folding voxels, which corresponds to full topology preservation on individual structures whilst vastly outperforming the other baselines on overall scene topology. The code is available at: https://github.com/mwyburd/TEDS-Net.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.