Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38935960›Full record

ArticleJMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology2022

Convolutional Neural Network-Based Automatic Classification of Colorectal and Prostate Tumor Biopsies Using Multispectral Imagery: System Development Study.

Remy Peyret, Duaa alSaeed, Fouad Khelifi, Nadia Al-Ghreimil, Heyam Al-Baity, Ahmed Bouridane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Remy PeyretNorthumbria University at Newcastle, Newcastle, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8730-0185
Duaa alSaeedCollege of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8464-7279
Fouad KhelifiNorthumbria University at Newcastle, Newcastle, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7413-0025
Nadia Al-GhreimilCollege of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5268-5230
Heyam Al-BaityCollege of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4590-3399
Ahmed BouridaneNorthumbria University at Newcastle, Newcastle, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1474-2772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal and prostate cancers are the most common types of cancer in men worldwide. To diagnose colorectal and prostate cancer, a pathologist performs a histological analysis on needle biopsy samples. This manual process is time-consuming and error-prone, resulting in high intra- and interobserver variability, which affects diagnosis reliability.

objectiveThis study aims to develop an automatic computerized system for diagnosing colorectal and prostate tumors by using images of biopsy samples to reduce time and diagnosis error rates associated with human analysis.

methodsIn this study, we proposed a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for classifying colorectal and prostate tumors from multispectral images of biopsy samples. The key idea was to remove the last block of the convolutional layers and halve the number of filters per layer.

resultsOur results showed excellent performance, with an average test accuracy of 99.8% and 99.5% for the prostate and colorectal data sets, respectively. The system showed excellent performance when compared with pretrained CNNs and other classification methods, as it avoids the preprocessing phase while using a single CNN model for the whole classification task. Overall, the proposed CNN architecture was globally the best-performing system for classifying colorectal and prostate tumor images.

conclusionsThe proposed CNN architecture was detailed and compared with previously trained network models used as feature extractors. These CNNs were also compared with other classification techniques. As opposed to pretrained CNNs and other classification approaches, the proposed CNN yielded excellent results. The computational complexity of the CNNs was also investigated, and it was shown that the proposed CNN is better at classifying images than pretrained networks because it does not require preprocessing. Thus, the overall analysis was that the proposed CNN architecture was globally the best-performing system for classifying colorectal and prostate tumor images.

Indexed as

classificationcolorectal tumorconvolutional neural networksimage processingmachine learningprostate tumor

Identifiers

PMID38935960
PMCPMC11135179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.