Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38935959›Full record

ArticleJMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology2022

Diagnosis of a Single-Nucleotide Variant in Whole-Exome Sequencing Data for Patients With Inherited Diseases: Machine Learning Study Using Artificial Intelligence Variant Prioritization.

Yu-Shan Huang, Ching Hsu, Yu-Chang Chune, I-Cheng Liao, Hsin Wang, Yi-Lin Lin, Wuh-Liang Hwu, Ni-Chung Lee, Feipei Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yu-Shan HuangDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2876-9079
Ching HsuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0560-1019
Yu-Chang ChuneDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7290-9446
I-Cheng LiaoDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8261-7554
Hsin WangGraduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1929-6449
Yi-Lin LinDepartment of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3869-0479
Wuh-Liang HwuDepartment of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6690-4879
Ni-Chung LeeDepartment of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5011-7499
Feipei LaiDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7147-8122

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, thanks to the rapid development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, an entire human genome can be sequenced in a short period. As a result, NGS technology is now being widely introduced into clinical diagnosis practice, especially for diagnosis of hereditary disorders. Although the exome data of single-nucleotide variant (SNV) can be generated using these approaches, processing the DNA sequence data of a patient requires multiple tools and complex bioinformatics pipelines.

objectiveThis study aims to assist physicians to automatically interpret the genetic variation information generated by NGS in a short period. To determine the true causal variants of a patient with genetic disease, currently, physicians often need to view numerous features on every variant manually and search for literature in different databases to understand the effect of genetic variation.

methodsWe constructed a machine learning model for predicting disease-causing variants in exome data. We collected sequencing data from whole-exome sequencing (WES) and gene panel as training set, and then integrated variant annotations from multiple genetic databases for model training. The model built ranked SNVs and output the most possible disease-causing candidates. For model testing, we collected WES data from 108 patients with rare genetic disorders in National Taiwan University Hospital. We applied sequencing data and phenotypic information automatically extracted by a keyword extraction tool from patient's electronic medical records into our machine learning model.

resultsWe succeeded in locating 92.5% (124/134) of the causative variant in the top 10 ranking list among an average of 741 candidate variants per person after filtering. AI Variant Prioritizer was able to assign the target gene to the top rank for around 61.1% (66/108) of the patients, followed by Variant Prioritizer, which assigned it for 44.4% (48/108) of the patients. The cumulative rank result revealed that our AI Variant Prioritizer has the highest accuracy at ranks 1, 5, 10, and 20. It also shows that AI Variant Prioritizer presents better performance than other tools. After adopting the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms by looking up the databases, the top 10 ranking list can be increased to 93.5% (101/108).

conclusionsWe successfully applied sequencing data from WES and free-text phenotypic information of patient's disease automatically extracted by the keyword extraction tool for model training and testing. By interpreting our model, we identified which features of variants are important. Besides, we achieved a satisfactory result on finding the target variant in our testing data set. After adopting the HPO terms by looking up the databases, the top 10 ranking list can be increased to 93.5% (101/108). The performance of the model is similar to that of manual analysis, and it has been used to help National Taiwan University Hospital with a genetic diagnosis.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegenetic variation analysismachine learningnext-generation sequencingwhole-exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38935959
PMCPMC11168239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.