Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38935958›Full record

ArticleJMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology2024

It Is in Our DNA: Bringing Electronic Health Records and Genomic Data Together for Precision Medicine.

Alan J Robertson, Andrew J Mallett, Zornitza Stark, Clair Sullivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alan J RobertsonFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Hertson, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3631-5894
Andrew J MallettDepartment of Renal Medicine, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8752-2551
Zornitza StarkVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-1371
Clair SullivanQueensland Digital Health Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2475-9989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health care is at a turning point. We are shifting from protocolized medicine to precision medicine, and digital health systems are facilitating this shift. By providing clinicians with detailed information for each patient and analytic support for decision-making at the point of care, digital health technologies are enabling a new era of precision medicine. Genomic data also provide clinicians with information that can improve the accuracy and timeliness of diagnosis, optimize prescribing, and target risk reduction strategies, all of which are key elements for precision medicine. However, genomic data are predominantly seen as diagnostic information and are not routinely integrated into the clinical workflows of electronic medical records. The use of genomic data holds significant potential for precision medicine; however, as genomic data are fundamentally different from the information collected during routine practice, special considerations are needed to use this information in a digital health setting. This paper outlines the potential of genomic data integration with electronic records, and how these data can enable precision medicine.

Indexed as

decision-makingdiagnosisdigital healthDNAelectronic health recordselectronic medical recordsgeneticsgenomicgenomic datagenomicsprecision medicinerisk reductionsupportstimeliness

Identifiers

PMID38935958
PMCPMC11211701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.