Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38935913›Full record

SynthesisMedical mycology2024

Candida glabrata (Nakaseomyces glabrata): A systematic review of clinical and microbiological data from 2011 to 2021 to inform the World Health Organization Fungal Priority Pathogens List.

Justin Beardsley, Hannah Yejin Kim, Aiken Dao, Sarah Kidd, Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo, Tania C Sorrell, Evelina Tacconelli, Arunaloke Chakrabarti, Thomas S Harrison, Felix Bongomin and 8 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical mycology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Persistent Non-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Journal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mechanism of azole resistance inJournal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Justin BeardsleySydney Infectious Diseases Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1978-1559
Hannah Yejin KimSydney Infectious Diseases Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Aiken DaoSydney Infectious Diseases Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0631-2975
Sarah KiddNational Mycology Reference Centre, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5957-4178
Ana Alastruey-IzquierdoInstituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8651-4405
Tania C SorrellSydney Infectious Diseases Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9460-0960
Evelina TacconelliUniversity of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Arunaloke ChakrabartiDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1555-3807
Thomas S HarrisonInstitute of Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London, and MRC Centre for Medical Mycology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Felix BongominDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Gulu University, Gulu, Uganda.
Valeria GiganteImpact Initiatives and Research Coordination Unit, Global Coordination and Partnership Department, Antimicrobial Resistance Division, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marcelo GalasAntimicrobial Resistance Special Program, Communicable Diseases and Environmental Determinants of Health, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
Siswanto SiswantoWorld Health Organization, South East Asia Region Office, New Delhi, India.
Daniel Argaw DagneDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Felipe RoitbergDepartment of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hatim SatiImpact Initiatives and Research Coordination Unit, Global Coordination and Partnership Department, Antimicrobial Resistance Division, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
C Orla MorrisseyAlfred Health/ Department of Infectious Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jan-Willem AlffenaarSydney Infectious Diseases Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6703-0288

Funding

Ministry of Education and ScienceWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognising the growing global burden of fungal infections, the World Health Organization (WHO) established an advisory group consisting of experts in fungal diseases to develop a Fungal Priority Pathogen List. Pathogens were ranked based on their research and development needs and perceived public health importance using a series of global surveys and pathogen characteristics derived from systematic reviews. This systematic review evaluates the features and global impact of invasive disease caused by Candida glabrata (Nakaseomyces glabrata). PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting on mortality, morbidity (hospitalization and disability), drug resistance (including isolates from sterile and non-sterile sites, since these reflect the same organisms causing invasive infections), preventability, yearly incidence, diagnostics, treatability, and distribution/emergence in the last 10 years. Candida glabrata (N. glabrata) causes difficult-to-treat invasive infections, particularly in patients with underlying conditions such as immunodeficiency, diabetes, or those who have received broad-spectrum antibiotics or chemotherapy. Beyond standard infection prevention and control measures, no specific preventative measures have been described. We found that infection is associated with high mortality rates and that there is a lack of data on complications and sequelae. Resistance to azoles is common and well described in echinocandins-in both cases, the resistance rates are increasing. Candida glabrata remains mostly susceptible to amphotericin and flucytosine. However, the incidence of the disease is increasing, both at the population level and as a proportion of all invasive yeast infections, and the increases appear related to the use of antifungal agents.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandida glabrataDrug Resistance, FungalWorld Health OrganizationCandidiasisGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceAntifungal Agentsantifungal resistancecandidaemiaCandida glabratainvasive fungal infectionNakaseomyces glabrata

Identifiers

PMID38935913
PMCPMC11210615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.