Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38935911›Full record

SynthesisMedical mycology2024

Pichia kudriavzevii (Candida krusei): A systematic review to inform the World Health Organisation priority list of fungal pathogens.

Thi Anh Nguyen, Hannah Yejin Kim, Sophie Stocker, Sarah Kidd, Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo, Aiken Dao, Thomas Harrison, Retno Wahyuningsih, Volker Rickerts, John Perfect and 8 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical mycology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Unlock the Potential of Pichia in Coffee: Knowledge Transfer From Fermented Beverages.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Species Distribution ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Voriconazole Activity AgainstMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026
    Article
  17. Genomic Insights ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Thi Anh NguyenFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hannah Yejin KimFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sophie StockerFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2114-587X
Sarah KiddNational Mycology Reference Centre, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5957-4178
Ana Alastruey-IzquierdoMycology Reference Laboratory, National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8651-4405
Aiken DaoSydney Infectious Diseases Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0631-2975
Thomas HarrisonInstitute of Infection and Immunity, St George's University London, London, UK.
Retno WahyuningsihDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-3294-5792
Volker RickertsRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
John PerfectDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
David W DenningManchester Fungal Infection Group (MFIG), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Marcio NucciDepartment of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4867-0014
Alessandro CassiniCantonal Doctor Office, Public Health Department, Canton of Vaud, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Justin BeardsleySydney Infectious Diseases Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1978-1559
Valeria GiganteAMR Division, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hatim SatiAMR Division, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
C Orla MorrisseyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jan-Willem AlffenaarFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6703-0288

Funding

Ministry of Education and ScienceWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the growing global threat of fungal infections, in 2020 the World Health Organisation (WHO) established an Expert Group to identify priority fungi and develop the first WHO fungal priority pathogen list (FPPL). The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the features and global impact of invasive infections caused by Pichia kudriavzevii (formerly known as Candida krusei). PubMed and Web of Science were used to identify studies published between 1 January 2011 and 18 February 2021 reporting on the criteria of mortality, morbidity (defined as hospitalisation and length of stay), drug resistance, preventability, yearly incidence, and distribution/emergence. Overall, 33 studies were evaluated. Mortality rates of up to 67% in adults were reported. Despite the intrinsic resistance of P. kudriavzevii to fluconazole with decreased susceptibility to amphotericin B, resistance (or non-wild-type rate) to other azoles and echinocandins was low, ranging between 0 and 5%. Risk factors for developing P. kudriavzevii infections included low birth weight, prior use of antibiotics/antifungals, and an underlying diagnosis of gastrointestinal disease or cancer. The incidence of infections caused by P. kudriavzevii is generally low (∼5% of all Candida-like blood isolates) and stable over the 10-year timeframe, although additional surveillance data are needed. Strategies targeting the identified risk factors for developing P. kudriavzevii infections should be developed and tested for effectiveness and feasibility of implementation. Studies presenting data on epidemiology and susceptibility of P. kudriavzevii were scarce, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Thus, global surveillance systems are required to monitor the incidence, susceptibility, and morbidity of P. kudriavzevii invasive infections to inform diagnosis and treatment. Timely species-level identification and susceptibility testing should be conducted to reduce the high mortality and limit the spread of P. kudriavzevii in healthcare facilities.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsDrug Resistance, FungalPichiaWorld Health OrganizationCandidiasisHumansIncidenceRisk FactorsAntifungal AgentsCandida kruseidrug resistanceepidemiologymortalityPichia kudriavzeviiprevention

Identifiers

PMID38935911
PMCPMC11210618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.