Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38935900›Full record

SynthesisMedical mycology2024

Candida auris-a systematic review to inform the world health organization fungal priority pathogens list.

Hannah Yejin Kim, Thi Anh Nguyen, Sarah Kidd, Joshua Chambers, Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo, Jong-Hee Shin, Aiken Dao, Agustina Forastiero, Retno Wahyuningsih, Arunoloke Chakrabarti and 6 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical mycology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Changes in Epidemiology of Candidemia in the United States With a Focus on Candida auris.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Study Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Active Screening forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Clinical Outcomes of Micafungin and Anidulafungin inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Predictors ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  18. Insights on molecular drivers of phenotypic plasticity in Candidozyma auris.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Hannah Yejin KimSydney Infectious Disease Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Thi Anh NguyenFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah KiddNational Mycology Reference Centre, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, SA Pathology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5957-4178
Joshua ChambersFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ana Alastruey-IzquierdoMycology Reference Laboratory, National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8651-4405
Jong-Hee ShinChonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Aiken DaoSydney Infectious Disease Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0631-2975
Agustina ForastieroAntimicrobial Resistance Special Program, Communicable Diseases and Environmental Determinants of Health, Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), Washington, DC, United States of America.
Retno WahyuningsihDepartment of Parasitology, Division of Mycology, Faculty of Medicine of the Universitas Indonesia and Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-3294-5792
Arunoloke ChakrabartiDirector of the WHO CC for Mycology, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1555-3807
Peter BeyerAMR Division, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Valeria GiganteAMR Division, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Justin BeardsleySydney Infectious Disease Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1978-1559
Hatim SatiAMR Division, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
C Orla MorrisseyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jan-Willem AlffenaarSydney Infectious Disease Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6703-0288

Funding

Ministry of Education and ScienceWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) in 2022 developed a fungal priority pathogen list. Candida auris was ultimately ranked as a critical priority pathogen. PubMed and Web of Science were used to find studies published from 1 January 2011 to 18 February 2021, reporting on predefined criteria including: mortality, morbidity (i.e., hospitalization and disability), drug resistance, preventability, yearly incidence, and distribution/emergence. Thirty-seven studies were included in the final analysis. The overall and 30-day mortality rates associated with C. auris candidaemia ranged from 29% to 62% and 23% to 67%, respectively. The median length of hospital stay was 46-68 days, ranging up to 140 days. Late-onset complications of C. auris candidaemia included metastatic septic complications. Resistance rates to fluconazole were as high as 87%-100%. Susceptibility to isavuconazole, itraconazole, and posaconazole varied with MIC90 values of 0.06-1.0 mg/l. Resistance rates to voriconazole ranged widely from 28% to 98%. Resistance rates ranged between 8% and 35% for amphotericin B and 0%-8% for echinocandins. Over the last ten years, outbreaks due to C. auris have been reported in in all WHO regions. Given the outbreak potential of C. auris, the emergence and spread of MDR strains, and the challenges associated with its identification, and eradication of its environmental sources in healthcare settings, prevention and control measures based on the identified risk factors should be evaluated for their effectiveness and feasibility. Global surveillance studies could better inform the incidence rates and distribution patterns to evaluate the global burden of C. auris infections.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandida aurisCandidiasisDrug Resistance, FungalWorld Health OrganizationCandidaCandidemiaDisease OutbreaksHumansIncidenceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsCandida aurisdrug resistanceepidemiologymortalityprevention

Identifiers

PMID38935900
PMCPMC11210622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.