Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38935862›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2024

Adaptations to a patient navigation program for follow-up colonoscopy in rural primary care practices.

Jamie H Thompson, Jennifer S Rivelli, Jennifer L Schneider, Erin S Kenzie, Emily Myers, Jennifer Coury, Melinda Davis, Priyanka Gautom, Gloria D Coronado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jamie H ThompsonScience Programs Department, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jennifer S RivelliScience Programs Department, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jennifer L SchneiderScience Programs Department, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Erin S KenzieOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Emily MyersOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jennifer CouryOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Melinda DavisOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Priyanka GautomScience Programs Department, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Gloria D CoronadoScience Programs Department, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

Smarter CRC Supplement for ACCSIS Patient NavigationUH3CA244298 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D, DAVIS, MELINDA MARIE · 2020 to 2023
$4.5M
Using Context to Improve Implementation of Evidenced-based Interventions for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Primary Care (Precise CRC)K07CA211971 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, MELINDA MARIE · 2017 to 2020
$683k
Screening More patients for CRC through Adapting and Refining Targeted Evidence-based Interventions in Rural settings (SMARTER CRC)UG3CA244298 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D, DAVIS, MELINDA MARIE · 2019 to 2019
$644k
NCI NIH HHS 1K07CA211971NCI NIH HHS K07 CA211971NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA244298NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA244298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient navigation is a recommended practice to improve cancer screenings among underserved populations including those residing in rural areas with care access barriers. We report on patient navigation programme adaptations to increase follow-up colonoscopy rates after abnormal fecal testing in rural primary care practices.

methodsParticipating clinics delivered a patient navigation programme to eligible patients from 28 affiliated clinics serving rural communities in Oregon clustered within 3 Medicaid health plans. Patient navigation adaptations were tracked using data sources including patient navigation training programme reflections, qualitative interviews, clinic meetings, and periodic reflections with practice facilitators.

findingsInitial, planned (proactive) adaptations were made to address the rural context; later, unplanned (reactive) adaptations were implemented to address the impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic. Initial planned adaptations to the patient navigation programme were made before the main trial to address the needs of the rural context, including provider shortages and geographic dispersion limiting both patient access to care and training opportunities for providers. Later unplanned adaptations were made primarily in response to COVID-19 care suspension and staff redeployments and shortages that occurred during implementation.

conclusionWhile unplanned adaptations were implemented to address the contextual impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care access patterns and staffing, the changes to training content and context were beneficial to the rural setting overall and should be sustained. Our findings can guide future efforts to optimise the success of such programmes in other rural settings and highlight the important role of adaptations in implementation projects.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyCOVID-19Health Services AccessibilityPatient NavigationPrimary Health CareColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleOregonRural Health ServicesRural PopulationSARS-CoV-2colorectal cancer screeningpatient navigationrural health

Identifiers

PMID38935862
PMCPMC11424257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.