ArticlePloS one2024
Assessment of polymeric mucin-drug interactions.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Prognosis of Patients with Mucinous Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Prevalent gut phages encode modular adhesins mediating epithelial binding and endoplasmic reticulum trafficking.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Modular design for drug delivery across hierarchical gastrointestinal barriers: From materials to systems.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Investigating the impact of charge and hydrophilicity on peptide-mucin interactions using a simple mucin model.AAPS open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mucosal-delivered drugs have to pass through the mucus layer before absorption through the epithelial cell membrane. Although there has been increasing interest in polymeric mucins, a major structural component of mucus, potentially acting as important physiological regulators of mucosal drug absorption, there are no reports that have systematically evaluated the interaction between mucins and drugs. In this study, we assessed the potential interaction between human polymeric mucins (MUC2, MUC5B, and MUC5AC) and various drugs with different chemical profiles by simple centrifugal method and fluorescence analysis. We found that paclitaxel, rifampicin, and theophylline likely induce the aggregation of MUC5B and/or MUC2. In addition, we showed that the binding affinity of drugs for polymeric mucins varied, not only between individual drugs but also among mucin subtypes. Furthermore, we demonstrated that deletion of MUC5AC and MUC5B in A549 cells increased the cytotoxic effects of cyclosporin A and paclitaxel, likely due to loss of mucin-drug interaction. In conclusion, our results indicate the necessity to determine the binding of drugs to mucins and their potential impact on the mucin network property.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.