ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2024
Enhanced Muscle Activation Using Robotic Assistance Within the Electromechanical Delay: Implications for Rehabilitation?
Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extending reach: hybrid robotic-functional electrical stimulation training for post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Trial
- The role of early intervention with upper limb rehabilitation robots in upper limb functional reconstruction and improving sarcopenia-related indicators in stroke patients.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- A Robotic Assistance With Specialized Timing Improves Motor Performance: Implications for Movement Training.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robotic rehabilitation has been shown to match the effects of conventional physical therapy on motor function for patients with neurological diseases. Rehabilitation robots have the potential to reduce therapists' workload in time-intensive training programs as well as perform actions that are not replicable by human therapists. We investigated the effects of one such modality that cannot be achieved by a human therapist: assistance and resistance within the electromechanical delay between muscle activation and muscle contraction during arm extension. We found increased muscle activation when providing robotic assistance within this electromechanical delay. Assistance provided within this delay moves the participant's arm quicker than their own muscle and increases the subsequent peak voluntary muscle activation compared to normal arm extension by 68.97 ± 80.05 % (SE = 0.021; p = 0.007 ). This is surprising since all previous literature shows that muscle activation either decreases or does not change when participants receive robotic assistance. As a consequence, traditional robotic rehabilitation incrementally reduces assistance as the patient improves to maintain levels of muscle activation which is suggested to be important for neuronal repair. The present result may enable therapists to no longer have to choose between providing assistance or increasing muscle activation. Instead, therapists may be able to provide assistance while also increasing muscle activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.