ArticleInternational microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology2025
A novel Enterococcus faecalis bacteriophage Ef212: biological and genomic features.
Article in International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive analysis of the kinetics of infection of lytic bacteriophages specific to the ESKAPE and critical pathogens.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Genomic characterization of a novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteriophage representing the newly proposed genus Angoravirus: in vitro antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025Article
- Novel strategies for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis biofilm control: bacteriophage (vB_EfaS_ZC1), propolis, and their combined effects in an ex vivo endodontic model.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to isolate and characterize biological and genomic features of a phage infecting Enterococcus faecalis. The phage was isolated from environmental water and temperature and pH stability, one-step growth curve, and multiplicity of infection (MOI) were determined. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) and structural and functional annotations were performed. Its antibiofilm activity was also evaluated. The optimal MOI was 0.01, the latency period was 5 min, and the burst size was 202 plaque forming unit (PFU). High phage survival rates were observed at between pH 4-10 and temperatures between 4-50 °C. WGS and Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed that it was an Efquatrovirus representing siphovirus morphotype respectively. It was named as Enterococcus phage Ef212 and has a linear 40,690 bp double-stranded DNA with 45.3% G + C content (GenBank accession number: OR052631). BACPHLIP tool demonstrated that Enterococcus phage Ef212 is a lytic phage (88%). A total of 80 open reading frames (ORFs) were found and there were no antibiotic resistance genes, pathogenicity, virulence genes, or tRNAs in the phage genome. It was diverged from the most similar phages (identity, 88.35%; coverage, 89%) by phylogenetic analysis. Phage Ef212 shared a large part of its genome (60/80) with several other phages, yet some unique parts were found in their genomes. Host range analysis showed that phage Ef212 showed lytic activity against vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis clinical isolates. This novel phage Ef212 showed the ability to inhibit and reduce the biofilm formation by around 42% and 38%, respectively. The biological and genomic features indicate that having an effective antibacterial activity, phage Ef212 seemed a promising therapeutic and biocontrol agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38935199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.