ArticleInsights into imaging2024
Fully automated assessment of the future liver remnant in a blood-free setting via CT before major hepatectomy via deep learning.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepatic Vessel Map (HVM): An Expert-Annotated CT Dataset for Clinically Applicable AI in Liver Vascular Segmentation and Surgical Planning.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A Multi-center Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) MRI Dataset with Expert Annotations and clinicopathological data.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence-Based Liver-Related Semantic Segmentation Techniques and Applications Using CT Imaging.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Radiomics Beyond Radiology: Literature Review on Prediction of Future Liver Remnant Volume and Function Before Hepatic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model for automated segmentation of hepatic and portal veins, and apply the model in blood-free future liver remnant (FLR) assessments via CT before major hepatectomy.
methods3-dimensional 3D U-Net models were developed for the automatic segmentation of hepatic veins and portal veins on contrast-enhanced CT images. A total of 170 patients treated from January 2018 to March 2019 were included. 3D U-Net models were trained and tested under various liver conditions. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and volumetric similarity (VS) were used to evaluate the segmentation accuracy. The use of quantitative volumetry for evaluating resection was compared between blood-filled and blood-free settings and between manual and automated segmentation.
resultsThe DSC values in the test dataset for hepatic veins and portal veins were 0.66 ± 0.08 (95% CI: (0.65, 0.68)) and 0.67 ± 0.07 (95% CI: (0.66, 0.69)), the VS values were 0.80 ± 0.10 (95% CI: (0.79, 0.84)) and 0.74 ± 0.08 (95% CI: (0.73, 0.76)), respectively No significant differences in FLR, FLR% assessments, or the percentage of major hepatectomy patients were noted between the blood-filled and blood-free settings (p = 0.67, 0.59 and 0.99 for manual methods, p = 0.66, 0.99 and 0.99 for automated methods, respectively) according to the use of manual and automated segmentation methods.
conclusionFully automated segmentation of hepatic veins and portal veins and FLR assessment via blood-free CT before major hepatectomy are accurate and applicable in clinical cases involving the use of DL. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our fully automatic models could segment hepatic veins, portal veins, and future liver remnant in blood-free setting on CT images before major hepatectomy with reliable outcomes. KEY POINTS: Fully automatic segmentation of hepatic veins and portal veins was feasible in clinical practice. Fully automatic volumetry of future liver remnant (FLR)% in a blood-free setting was robust. No significant differences in FLR% assessments were noted between the blood-filled and blood-free settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.