ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Unveiling Statins and Genetics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Coimbra Eye Study-Report 9.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of current Statin use with incident age-related macular degeneration: using time-varying propensity scores.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Article
- The Chemical Stability Characterization and Kinetics of Statins in Aqueous Cyclodextrin Ocular Preparations: A Formulation Perspective.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Author Response: Unveiling Statins and Genetics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Progression: What Is the Appropriate Modeling Strategy?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Unveiling Statins and Genetics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Progression: What Is the Appropriate Modeling Strategy?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the association of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) progression and statins, connected with AMD genetic risk, and if there is an interplay between statins and genetics. Methods: In this analysis, 682 subjects made two visits (6.5-year follow-up) of the Coimbra Eye Study. Subjects who started taking statins at any time point between the two visits were considered. Progressors were defined as not having AMD at baseline and having any AMD at follow-up. Genetic risk scores (GRSs) were calculated individually with 52 independent variants associated with AMD. Time to progression was estimated using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curves. An extended Cox model was used for the association between statins and GRS with the risk for AMD progression. Multiplicative and additive interactions were assessed. Results: Median survival time was 7.50 years for subjects not taking statins and 7.62 for subjects taking statins (P < 0.001). Statin intake reduced the risk for progression to AMD in 48%, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, and diabetes (model 1) and GRS (model 2). The combined effects of not taking statins and having high GRS increased the progression risk fourfold compared to taking statins and having low GRS (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.62-11.16; P = 0.003). For subjects not taking statins, an increased risk of progression was found for those subjects with high GRS compared to subjects with low GRS (HR = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.13-2.85; P = 0.013). No statistically significant multiplicative or additive interactions were found. Conclusions: Statins seem to be protective against AMD progression, and genetics may play a role in treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.