Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38934792›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin2024

Personalized Cognitive Health in Psychiatry: Current State and the Promise of Computational Methods.

Cathy S Chen, Sophia Vinogradov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. NMDA receptor ablation in medial prefrontal cortex disrupts value updating and reward history integration.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Individual differences in sequential decision-making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cathy S ChenDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2506-8522
Sophia VinogradovDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Using a computational and network neuroscience framework to study pharmacological manipulations of state representation processes in early psychosisP50MH119569 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI A DAVID REDISH, Sophia Vinogradov · 2020 to 2026
$24.5M
Targeting Cognition and Motivation in Coordinated Specialty Care for Early PsychosisR01MH120589 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MEYER-KALOS, PIPER S., VINOGRADOV, SOPHIA · 2019 to 2024
$6.1M
Naval Research N00014-21-1-24-63NIH HHS P50 MH119569, R01MH120589NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH119569NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecades of research have firmly established that cognitive health and cognitive treatment services are a key need for people living with psychosis. However, many current clinical programs do not address this need, despite the essential role that an individual's cognitive and social cognitive capacities play in determining their real-world functioning. Preliminary practice-based research in the Early Psychosis Intervention Network early psychosis intervention network shows that it is possible to develop and implement tools that delineate an individuals' cognitive health profile and that help engage the client and the clinician in shared decision-making and treatment planning that includes cognitive treatments. These findings signify a promising shift toward personalized cognitive health. STUDY

designExtending upon this early progress, we review the concept of interindividual variability in cognitive domains/processes in psychosis as the basis for offering personalized treatment plans. We present evidence from studies that have used traditional neuropsychological measures as well as findings from emerging computational studies that leverage trial-by-trial behavior data to illuminate the different latent strategies that individuals employ. STUDY

resultWe posit that these computational techniques, when combined with traditional cognitive assessments, can enrich our understanding of individual differences in treatment needs, which in turn can guide evermore personalized interventions.

conclusionAs we find clinically relevant ways to decompose maladaptive behaviors into separate latent cognitive elements captured by model parameters, the ultimate goal is to develop and implement approaches that empower clients and their clinical providers to leverage individual's existing learning capacities to improve their cognitive health and well-being.

Indexed as

Precision MedicinePsychotic DisordersCognitive DysfunctionHumanscognitioncomputational analysesinterindividual variabilitypersonalized treatmentreward learning

Identifiers

PMID38934792
PMCPMC11349010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.