Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38934567›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2024

A Comprehensive Clinicopathologic and Molecular Reappraisal of GLI1 -altered Mesenchymal Tumors with Pooled Outcome Analysis Showing Poor Survival in GLI1 - amplified Versus GLI1- rearranged Tumors.

Carla Saoud, Abbas Agaimy, Josephine K Dermawan, Jie-Fu Chen, Marc K Rosenblum, Brendan C Dickson, Nooshin Dashti, Michael Michal, Kemal Kosemehmetoglu, Nasir Ud Din and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. GLI1-rearranged mesenchymal tumor of the ovary with a novel ACTG1::GLI1 fusion.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Global Health and Genomics.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Cells · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carla SaoudDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Abbas AgaimyInstitute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Josephine K DermawanRobert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Jie-Fu ChenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Marc K RosenblumDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Brendan C DicksonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nooshin DashtiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Michael MichalDepartment of Pathology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Plzeň, Czech Republic; Bioptical Laboratory, Ltd, Plzeň, Czech Republic.
Kemal KosemehmetogluDepartment of Pathology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Nasir Ud DinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Karen AlbrittonAdolescent and Young Adult Oncology, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX.
Narasimhan P AgaramDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Cristina R AntonescuDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Targeting Oncogenic Pathways in Genetically Complex SarcomasP50CA217694 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI William D. Tap · 2018 to 2026
$21.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA217694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GLI1 -altered mesenchymal tumor is a recently described distinct pathologic entity with an established risk of malignancy, being defined molecularly by either GLI1 gene fusions or amplifications. The clinicopathologic overlap of tumors driven by the 2 seemingly distinct mechanisms of GLI1 activation is still emerging. Herein, we report the largest series of molecularly confirmed GLI1 -altered mesenchymal neoplasms to date, including 23 GLI1- amplified and 15 GLI1 -rearranged new cases, and perform a comparative clinicopathologic, genomic, and survival investigation. GLI1- rearranged tumors occurred in younger patients (42 vs. 52 y) and were larger compared with GLI1 -amplified tumors (5.6 cm vs. 1.5 cm, respectively). Histologic features were overall similar between the 2 groups, showing a multinodular pattern and a nested architecture of epithelioid, and less commonly spindle cells, surrounded by a rich capillary network. A distinct whorling pattern was noted among 3 GLI1 -amplified tumors. Scattered pleomorphic giant cells were rarely seen in both groups. The immunoprofile showed consistent expression of CD56, with variable S100, CD10 and SMA expression. Genomically, both groups had overall low mutation burdens, with rare TP53 mutations seen only in GLI1- amplified tumors. GLI1 -amplified mesenchymal tumors exhibit mostly a single amplicon at the 12q13-15 locus, compared with dedifferentiated liposarcoma, which showed a 2-peak amplification centered around CDK4 (12q14.1) and MDM2 (12q15). GLI1 -amplified tumors had a significantly higher GLI1 mRNA expression compared with GLI1 -rearranged tumors. Survival pooled analysis of current and published cases (n=83) showed a worse overall survival in GLI1 -amplified patients, with 16% succumbing to disease compared with 1.7% in the GLI1- rearranged group. Despite comparable progression rates, GLI1 -amplified tumors had a shorter median progression-free survival compared with GLI1 -rearranged tumors (25 mo vs. 77 mo). Univariate analysis showed that traditional histologic predictors of malignancy (mitotic count ≥4/10 high-power fields, presence of necrosis, and tumor size ≥5 cm) are associated with worse prognosis among GLI1 -altered mesenchymal tumors.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGene AmplificationGene RearrangementZinc Finger Protein GLI1AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeSoft Tissue NeoplasmsTime FactorsBiomarkers, TumorGLI1 protein, humanZinc Finger Protein GLI1

Identifiers

PMID38934567
PMCPMC12150273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.