Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38934547›Full record

ArticlemSystems2024

Benchmarking low- and high-throughput protein cleanup and digestion methods for human fecal metaproteomics.

Alessandro Tanca, Maria Antonietta Deledda, Laura De Diego, Marcello Abbondio, Sergio Uzzau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microbial Omics.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alessandro TancaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6066-7048
Maria Antonietta DeleddaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Laura De DiegoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Marcello AbbondioDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Sergio UzzauDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6246-2794

Funding

Fondazione di Sardegna (Sardinia Foundation) Progetti di Ricerca di Base Dipartimentali D.R. 2397 2021Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (MIUR) PON04a2_00557Università degli Studi di Sassari (UNISS) Fondo di Ateneo per la Ricerca 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of fecal metaproteomics to large-scale studies of the gut microbiota requires high-throughput analysis and standardized experimental protocols. Although high-throughput protein cleanup and digestion methods are increasingly used in shotgun proteomics, no studies have yet critically compared such protocols using human fecal samples. In this study, human fecal protein extracts were processed using several different protocols based on three main approaches: filter-aided sample preparation (FASP), solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP3), and suspension trapping (S-Trap). These protocols were applied in both low-throughput (i.e., microtube-based) and high-throughput (i.e., microplate-based) formats, and the final peptide mixtures were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry. The FASP-based methods and the combination of SP3 with in-StageTips (iST) yielded the best results in terms of the number of peptides identified through a database search against gut microbiome and human sequences. The efficiency of protein digestion, the ability to preserve hydrophobic peptides and high molecular weight proteins, and the reproducibility of the methods were also evaluated for the different protocols. Other relevant variables, including interindividual variability of stool, duration of protocols, and total costs, were considered and discussed. In conclusion, the data presented here can significantly contribute to the optimization and standardization of sample preparation protocols in human fecal metaproteomics. Furthermore, the promising results obtained with the high-throughput methods are expected to encourage the development of automated workflows and their application to large-scale gut microbiome studies.IMPORTANCEFecal metaproteomics is an experimental approach that allows the investigation of gut microbial functions, which are involved in many different physiological and pathological processes. Standardization and automation of sample preparation protocols in fecal metaproteomics are essential for its application in large-scale studies. Here, we comparatively evaluated different methods, available also in a high-throughput format, enabling two key steps of the metaproteomics analytical workflow (namely, protein cleanup and digestion). The results of our study provide critical information that may be useful for the optimization of metaproteomics experimental pipelines and their implementation in laboratory automation systems.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeProteomicsChromatography, LiquidHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansTandem Mass SpectrometryFASPgut microbiotamass spectrometrymetaproteomemicroplatemicrotubesample preparation

Identifiers

PMID38934547
PMCPMC11265449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.