ArticleImmunity, inflammation and disease2024
Prognostic analysis of MDA5-associated clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis with interstitial lung disease.
Article in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinically Amyopathic Dermatomyositis: Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Prognosis: A Systematic Review.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Predictors of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease in anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis: a meta-analysis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Influencing factors for rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease in patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic analysis of MDA5-associated clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis with interstitial lung disease.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024Article
- Positive HIV Screening Test in a Patient with Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease: A Case Report.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the prognostic factors of patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) positive clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM) and interstitial lung disease (ILD).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 125 patients with anti-MDA5 + CADM-ILD collected from 10 branches in eastern China between December 2014 and December 2022. Prognostic factors were analyzed using χ
resultsIn this cohort, 125 anti-MDA5 + CADM-ILD patients exhibited a rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD) incidence of 37.6%, and an overall mortality rate of 24.8%. One patient was lost to follow-up. After diagnosis of RPILD, a mortality rate of 53.2% occurred in patients died within 3 months, and that of 5.6% appeared in those who survived for more than 3 months. Multiple factor analysis revealed that C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 10 mg/L (p = 0.01) and recombinant human tripartite motif containing 21 (Ro52) (+) (p = 0.003) were associated with a higher risk of RPILD in anti-MDA5 + CADM-ILD patients; CRP ≥ 10 mg/L (p = 0.018) and the presence of RPILD (p = 0.003) were identified as the factors influencing survival time in these patients, while arthritis was the protective factor (p = 0.016).
conclusionPatients with anti-MDA5 + CADM-ILD will have a higher mortality rate, and the initial 3 months after diagnosis of RPILD is considered the risk window for the dismal prognosis. Patients with CRP ≥ 10 mg/L, Ro52 (+) and RPILD may be related to a shorter survival time, while patients complicated with arthritis may present with relatively mild conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.