ArticleCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening2025
Relationships Among Serological Indicators and
Article in Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between serum indicators and high-throughput drug screening (HDS) results, aiming to achieve specific therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
methodsThis study recruited patients with HCC who underwent surgical resection at the Hepatobiliary Surgery Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from December 2019 to December 2021. HCC tissues were obtained from patients during surgery and subjected to
resultsIn this study, 82 patients with HCC who had undergone hepatectomy and completed in vitro cell culture and HDS testing were evaluated. Using Spearman's correlation with a significance threshold of P<0.05 and |r|>0.40, we identified significant associations between serological indicators and specific drug regimens: NLR correlated with 5-Fluorouracil, 5- Fluorouracil+Calcium folinate (FOLFOX4), and Capecitabine + Cisplatin (XP); PLR with FOLFOX4; SII with XP, FOLFOX4, Doxorubicin + Oxaliplatin (ADM+L-OHP); and SIRI with XP and FOLFOX4. No correlations were found between PNI or LMR and any drug inhibition rates. A comprehensive evaluation using linear regression analysis-which included variables such as sex, age, hepatitis B virus and liver cirrhosis status, size and number of lesions, alphafetoprotein, total bilirubin, albumin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and prothrombin time, alongside NLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI was conducted in relation to drug regimens. This analysis revealed that NLR, SII, and SIRI are significant predictors of FOLFOX4 inhibition rate, while NLR predicts the inhibition rate of XP effectively. However, no significant links were established between molecular targeted drugs, other antitumor drugs, and serological indicators.
conclusionsNLR, SII, and SIRI were correlated with FOLFOX4, and the higher the values of NLR, SII, and SIRI, the higher the in vitro inhibition of FOLFOX. Also, NLR was correlated with XP, and the higher the value of NLR, the higher the in vitro inhibition of XP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38934277What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.