Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38934047›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2024

Advancing the understanding and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder with computational modelling.

Marianne Skogbrott Birkeland, Joakim Sundnes

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marianne Skogbrott BirkelandNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2388-8474
Joakim SundnesSimula Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1890-7722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existing theories of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have inspired large volumes of research and have contributed substantially to our current knowledge base. However, most of the theories are of a qualitative and verbal nature, and may be difficult to evaluate and compare with each other. In this paper, we propose that one way forward is to use computational modelling to formulate more precise theories of PTSD that can be evaluated by (1) assessing whether the model can explain fundamental phenomena related to PTSD, and (2) comparing simulated outcomes with real data. Computational modelling can force us to describe processes more precisely and achieve stronger theories that are viable for testing. Establishing the theoretical groundwork before undertaking empirical studies can help us to avoid doing research with low probability of valid results, and counteract the replicability crisis in psychology. In conclusion, computational modelling is a promising avenue for advancing the understanding and treatment of PTSD.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, PsychologicalStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticHumansagent-basedbasado en agentescomputational modellingdinámica de sistemasmathematical modellingmodelado computacionalmodelado matemáticoPTSDsystem dynamicsteoríaTEPTtheory

Identifiers

PMID38934047
PMCPMC12958375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.