ArticleHeliyon2024
Investigating influencing factors of learning satisfaction in AI ChatGPT for research: University students perspective.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of AI-mediated learning contexts in the personality-self-directed learning relationship among Chinese medical undergraduates: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Evaluating large language models for pharmacotherapy simulations: a mixed-methods study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Prompt engineering competence, knowledge management, and technology fit as drivers of educational sustainability through generative AI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Problematic use of generative artificial intelligence chatbots: current stage of conceptual and clinical understanding.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Platform shift in mental health support among undergraduates: from campus counselors to GenAI-based consultation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- AI overuse in education extending the technology acceptance model with Confucian cultural moderation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Navigating opportunities and challenges of generative AI in higher education: towards responsible, equitable, and human-centered integration.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- A study on factors influencing music enthusiast's behavioral intention to use generative AI for music composition based on an expanded technology acceptance model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impact of generative AI interaction and output quality on university students' learning outcomes: a technology-mediated and motivation-driven approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The mediating role of satisfaction in the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and students' behavioural intention to use ChatGPT.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and perceptions of MENA researchers towards the use of ChatGPT in research: A cross-sectional study.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Open- and closed-source LLMs in medical and engineering education.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence into veterinary education: student perspectives.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the determinants of ChatGPT adoption among university students and its impact on learning satisfaction. Utilizing the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and incorporating insights from interaction learning, collaborative learning, and information quality, a structural equation modeling approach was employed. This research collected valuable responses from 262 students at King Faisal University in Saudi Arabia through the use of self-report questionnaires. The data's reliability and validity were assessed using confirmation factor analysis, followed by path analysis to explore the hypotheses in the proposed model. The results indicate the pivotal roles of interaction learning and collaborative learning in fostering ChatGPT adoption. Social interaction played a significant role, as researchers engaging in conversations and knowledge-sharing expressed increased comfort with ChatGPT. Information quality was found to substantially influence researchers' decisions to continue using ChatGPT, emphasizing the need for ongoing improvement in the accuracy and relevance of content provided. Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness played intermediary roles in linking ChatGPT engagement to learning satisfaction. User-friendly interfaces and perceived utility were identified as crucial factors affecting overall satisfaction levels. Notably, ChatGPT positively impacted learning motivation, indicating its potential to enhance student engagement and interest in learning. The study's findings have implications for educational practitioners seeking to improve the implementation of AI technologies in university students, emphasizing user-friendly design, collaborative learning, and factors influencing satisfaction. The study concludes with insights into the complex interplay between AI-powered tools, learning objectives, and motivation, highlighting the need for continued research to comprehensively understand these dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.