Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38933954›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Investigating influencing factors of learning satisfaction in AI ChatGPT for research: University students perspective.

Mohammed Abdullatif Almulla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohammed Abdullatif AlmullaDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of ChatGPT adoption among university students and its impact on learning satisfaction. Utilizing the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and incorporating insights from interaction learning, collaborative learning, and information quality, a structural equation modeling approach was employed. This research collected valuable responses from 262 students at King Faisal University in Saudi Arabia through the use of self-report questionnaires. The data's reliability and validity were assessed using confirmation factor analysis, followed by path analysis to explore the hypotheses in the proposed model. The results indicate the pivotal roles of interaction learning and collaborative learning in fostering ChatGPT adoption. Social interaction played a significant role, as researchers engaging in conversations and knowledge-sharing expressed increased comfort with ChatGPT. Information quality was found to substantially influence researchers' decisions to continue using ChatGPT, emphasizing the need for ongoing improvement in the accuracy and relevance of content provided. Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness played intermediary roles in linking ChatGPT engagement to learning satisfaction. User-friendly interfaces and perceived utility were identified as crucial factors affecting overall satisfaction levels. Notably, ChatGPT positively impacted learning motivation, indicating its potential to enhance student engagement and interest in learning. The study's findings have implications for educational practitioners seeking to improve the implementation of AI technologies in university students, emphasizing user-friendly design, collaborative learning, and factors influencing satisfaction. The study concludes with insights into the complex interplay between AI-powered tools, learning objectives, and motivation, highlighting the need for continued research to comprehensively understand these dynamics.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChatGPTLearning satisfactionTechnology acceptance modelUniversity students

Identifiers

PMID38933954
PMCPMC11200296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.