ArticleHeliyon2024
Optimization of resources in intelligent electronic health systems based on internet of things to predict heart diseases via artificial neural network.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advanced applications in chronic disease monitoring using IoT mobile sensing device data, machine learning algorithms and frame theory: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Interpretable Semi-federated Learning for Multimodal Cardiac Imaging and Risk Stratification: A Privacy-Preserving Framework.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Optimized Feature Selection and Deep Neural Networks to Improve Heart Disease Prediction.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Combination of Deep and Statistical Features of the Tissue of Pathology Images to Classify and Diagnose the Degree of Malignancy of Prostate Cancer.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing cardiac disease detection via a fusion of machine learning and medical imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep convolutional fuzzy neural networks with stork optimization on chronic cardiovascular disease monitoring for pervasive healthcare services.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a paradigm shift in tandem with the expansion of ICT, smart electronic health systems hold great promise for enhancing healthcare delivery and illness prevention efforts. These systems acquire an in-depth understanding of patient health states through the real-time collection and analysis of medical data enabled by the Internet of Things (IoT) and machine learning. With the widespread use of cutting-edge artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques, predictive analytics in medicine can assist in making the shift from a reactive to a proactive healthcare strategy. With the ability to rapidly and precisely evaluate massive amounts of data, draw intelligent conclusions, and solve difficult issues, artificial neural networks could revolutionize several industries. Two cardiac illnesses were assessed in this study using a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network that incorporated a genetic algorithm and an error-back propagation mechanism. The ability of artificial neural networks to handle consecutive time series data is crucial for optimizing resources in smart electronic health systems, especially with the increasing volume of patient information and the broad use of electronic clinical records. This requires the creation of more accurate predictive models. Through the use of Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, the proposed system gathers data, which is then used to do predictive analytics on patient history-related electronic clinical data saved in the cloud. A smart healthcare system that uses Mu-LTM (multidirectional long-term memory) to accurately monitor and predict the risk of heart disease has a coverage error of 97.94 %, an accuracy of 97.89 %, a sensitivity of 97.96 %, and a specificity of 97.99 %. In comparison to other smart heart disease prediction systems, the F1-score of 97.95 % and precision of 97.71 % is very good.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.