ArticleFundamental research2024
Quantitative studies on charcoalification: Physical and chemical changes of charring wood.
Article in Fundamental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Porosity and Morphology of Microstructured Charcoal.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Changes in Physical and Water Sorption Characteristics of Three Solid Woods after One-Sided Surface Charring.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Charring-induced morphological changes of Chinese "Five Grains": An experimental study.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Charcoal is commonly preserved in both natural and artificial sediments, and is intensively used in paleontological, paleoenvironmental, and archaeological studies due to the abundant bio-information it contains. The biochemical properties of charcoal are also used for paleoclimatic reconstruction; however, the reliability of this approach has been challenged due to a lack of clarity on how physicochemical properties change during the charring process, as well as the temperatures required for charcoalification. To address this lack, in this study, Qinghai spruce and Chinese pine wood samples from the northeastern Tibetan Plateau were heated at different temperatures and for different lengths of time under restricted oxygen conditions. The reflectance; carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen content; and tracheid morphology were quantified before and after heating to assess changes related to the charring process. Archaeological charcoal remains were then evaluated to determine the charcoalification temperatures by comparing with the experimental results. The minimum temperature required for wood charcoalification was ∼300 °C, while temperatures recorded by archaeological charcoal were concentrated at 400-500 °C. During the charring experiments, the tracheid cell walls gradually homogenized, and tracheid cell wall thickness and lumen area decreased by ∼20%. On average, 50% mass losses were observed; the carbon and oxygen content (% wt.) approximately changed from 47% to 60% and 48% to 35% respectively, while the nitrogen content (% wt.) fluctuated around 0.2%. The reflectance increased slightly from 0% to 0.5%. We propose that the charcoalification of wood tissue refers to charring (in restricted air) and carbonization (in the almost absence of air) when the wood is exposed to a heat source, which then finally transforms into a black, inert solid. This quantitative study provided valuable data and a thorough assessment of the process of wood charcoalification, as well as accurately estimated the feasibility of using charcoal physicochemical properties in paleoclimatic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.