ArticleOncology letters2024
Benefits of adjuvant treatment with the Pingxiao capsule in patients with early breast cancer: A single‑center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early breast cancer (EBC) is cancer that has not spread beyond the breast or the axillary lymph nodes. The present retrospective cohort study investigated the efficacy and safety of the Pingxiao capsule (PXC), which contains a formula of traditional Chinese herbs, as adjuvant therapy in patients with EBC in a single Chinese academic medical center. Patients with EBC who had received surgery and chemotherapy were analyzed and divided into the PXC and non-PXC groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) time, overall survival (OS) time, demographic characteristics and adverse events were examined. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the differences in DFS and OS. A total of 371 participants with a median age of 54 years were included in this study. The median DFS time of all patients was 101 months. The overall DFS rate was 72.1% in the PXC group compared with 63.6% in the non-PXC group. For women with hormone receptor-negative tumors, the DFS rate in the PXC group was significantly higher than that in the non-PXC group, irrespective of node status. Adjuvant treatment with PXC for ≥3 months was associated with significantly longer median DFS time compared with that in the non-PXC group. In addition, the incidence of neutropenia rated to be grade 2 or higher was significantly lower in the PXC group compared with that in the control group, and a markedly, but non-significantly, lower prevalence of nausea was observed in PXC group (0 vs. 4.1%). In conclusion, PXC as an adjuvant therapy along with chemotherapy is associated with prolonged DFS times in patients with EBC when compared with chemotherapy alone. The therapeutic value of combined PXC and systemic chemotherapy should be further elucidated by rigorous prospective clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.