Beyond overlap: Considering habitat preference and fitness outcomes in the umbrella species concept.

J D Carlisle, K T Smith, J L Beck, M A Murphy, A D Chalfoun

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Animal conservation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J D CarlisleWyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Physiology, Program in Ecology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0304-2911

K T SmithDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Program in Ecology and Evolution, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.ORCID 0000-0009-0009-6733-9109

J L BeckDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Program in Ecology and Evolution, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0236-7343

M A MurphyDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Program in Ecology and Evolution, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6589-8929

A D ChalfounU.S. Geological Survey Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Physiology and Program in Ecology and Evolution, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0219-6006

Funding

Wyoming INBRE Phase 4- Equipment Supplement for x-ray diffractometer for Center for Advanced Scientific InstrumentationP20GM103432 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING · PI Robert Scott Seville · 2012 to 2026

$56.8M

NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103432

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Umbrella species and other surrogate-species approaches to conservation provide an appealing framework to extend the reach of conservation efforts beyond single species. For the umbrella species concept to be effective, populations of multiple species of concern must persist in areas protected on behalf of the umbrella species. Most assessments of the concept, however, focus exclusively on geographic overlap among umbrella and background species, and not measures that affect population persistence (e.g., habitat quality or fitness). We quantified the congruence between the habitat preferences and nesting success of a high-profile umbrella species (greater sage-grouse,

Indexed as

Brewer’s sparrowconservation by proxygreater sage-grousemachine learningsage thrashersurrogate speciesUmbrella speciesvesper sparrow

Identifiers

PMID38933688

DOI10.1111/acv.12899

PMCPMC11196921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceTDM

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.