ArticleCureus2024
Erythroblastosis Transformation-Specific Regulated Gene 1 (ERG) Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe erythroblastosis transformation-specific regulated gene 1 (ERG) is a transcription factor that can be used as an immunohistochemical (IHC) marker in the diagnosis and prognostication of malignancy. ERG was initially used in prostate cancer; however, it is a useful marker in extramedullary myeloid disease. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), dry bone marrow aspirate, and CD34, CD117-negative blast cells can be in a diagnostic dilemma. This audit aimed to (a) validate ERG IHC in bone marrow trephine samples, (b) quantify ERG IHC positivity in an AML cohort, and correlate concordance with CD34 and CD117 IHC, when available, and (c) to see whether ERG is a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of cases of AML.
methodsA retrospective audit was completed of all new and relapsed cases of AML over one year at a single center. For inclusion, patients needed a trephine specimen at presentation, and all had a hematoxylin and eosin(H&E) specimen, ERG IHC, and at least one or both of CD34 and CD117 IHC. Four pathologists independently assessed the stains quantitatively and qualitatively in comparison to the morphology seen on the H&E sample. The kappa value was used to assess agreement.
resultsSeventeen patients with AML met the inclusion criteria. All specimens had H&E, CD34, and ERG stains; 9/17 (53%) had CD117 IHC. ERG demonstrated high concordance with blast cells on H&E morphology, with a high agreement among pathologists. Qualitatively, pathologists recognized that ERG spared lymphoid nodules; however, it also stained granulocytes at various maturation stages.
conclusionERG is a sensitive marker for the diagnosis of AML. ERG can help visualize blast cells that have been confirmed by ancillary tests. More research into the utility of ERG in AML diagnostics is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.