ArticleCureus2024
Development and Evaluation of Alginate- and Carrageenan-Incorporated Scaffold for Bone Regeneration: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in Hydrogels: A Comprehensive Review of Natural and Synthetic Innovations for Biomedical Applications.Polymers · 2025Review
- Article
- Therapeutic applications of red marine seaweeds in dental care: innovations in oral health and treatment.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeriodontitis, a persistent inflammatory condition, results in the deterioration of both the hard and soft tissues in the periodontium, leading to the formation of intrabony defects. Restoring the lost tissues, particularly bone, is possible through tissue engineering techniques utilizing scaffolds made from different polymers. Consequently, this research focuses on creating and assessing a scaffold infused with alginate (Sigma Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) and carrageenan (Sigma Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) for the purpose of bone regeneration.
methodsAn in vitro investigation was conducted to assess the characteristics of the recently formulated scaffold. Spectroscopic analysis, tensile strength testing, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, and degradation testing were carried out to evaluate both the physical and biological attributes of the scaffold.
resultsIBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, V. 1.2 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. A one-way ANOVA test was done to determine the significance of tensile strength, and a paired t-test was done to check the significance of the degradation test. The in vitro research unveiled notable distinctions in the physical and biological attributes between the scaffold infused with alginate and carrageenan and the PerioCol® (p<0.05).
conclusionThe scaffold incorporating alginate and carrageenan demonstrated superior outcomes concerning parameters such as tensile stress and strain, degradation rate, percentage bone volume, and object surface density when contrasted with the conventional PerioCol®. Therefore, the scaffold infused with alginate and carrageenan emerges as a promising candidate for bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.