ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Weak central coherence in neurodevelopmental disorders: a comparative study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- ShopAutiPlan: Validating a Serious Game for Assessing Executive Planning in Autism.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026Article
- Examining the diametric model of autistic and psychotic traits through temporal perception.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Japanese Translation of the Detail and Flexibility Questionnaire (DFlex).Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- How do we reconcile the seemingly contradictory theories of Gestalt language processing and weak central coherence?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- The Future of Perceptual Dysregulation in Psychiatric Nosology.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025Review
- Clinical practice guidelines for cognitive impairment in Autism spectrum disorder - Assessment and management.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Central coherence is the normal tendency to process and give meaning to incoming information taking into account the context or global view of that information. Methods: We assessed the central coherence of 252 school children of normal intelligence between 6 and 11 years old. We compared the performance of two groups: (a) a control group ( Results: The NVLD+ADHD, SCD and ASD1 groups showed weak central coherence. The performance of the ADHD group was normal and differed significantly from the NVLD+ADHD group. Conclusion: Central coherence deficit was not exclusive to ASD1: it also characterizes NVLD and SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.