Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38933415›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2024

Zhenzhen Wang, Jumao Yuan, Yan Xu, Nuo Shi, Lin Lin, Ruirui Wang, Rong Dai, Lin Xu, Ning Hao, Qianyi Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Valorization ofCells · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biomimetic materials for medical applications.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhenzhen WangPeterson's Lab, Shanghai, PR China.
Jumao YuanPeterson's Lab, Shanghai, PR China.
Yan XuInstitute of Symbolcell Biotechology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, PR China.
Nuo ShiPeterson's Lab, Shanghai, PR China.
Lin LinPeterson's Lab, Shanghai, PR China.
Ruirui WangPeterson's Lab, Shanghai, PR China.
Rong DaiBaudry Biotech. Co., Ltd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, PR China.
Lin XuPeterson's Lab, Shanghai, PR China.
Ning HaoCollege of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, PR China.
Qianyi LiInternational Laboratory in Cancer, Aging and Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine/Ruijin Hospital/CNRS/Inserm/Côte d'Azur University, Shanghai, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoaging, primarily caused by ultraviolet (UV) light, is the major factor in extrinsic skin aging. Existing anti-photoaging strategies mainly focus on early sun protection or repairing damaged skin, lacking a comprehensive treatment strategy. Therefore, this study developed a dressing that actively shields against UV radiation and repairs photoaged skin, offering double protection. This study utilized exosome-like nanovesicles derived from

Indexed as

Exosome-like nanovesiclesExtracellular vesiclesHyaluronic acid hydrogelPhotoagingSkin regenerationUV shielding

Identifiers

PMID38933415
PMCPMC11201150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.