Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38933388›Full record

ReviewFundamental research2022

Molecular biomarkers, network biomarkers, and dynamic network biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of rare diseases.

Shijie Tang, Kai Yuan, Luonan Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fundamental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Circulating microRNAs as Biomarkers of Various Forms of Epilepsy.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Biomarker Landscape in RASopathies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shijie TangKey Laboratory of Systems Biology, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Kai YuanShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, China.
Luonan ChenKey Laboratory of Systems Biology, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The difficulty of converting scientific research findings into novel pharmacological treatments for rare and life-threatening diseases is enormous. Biomarkers related to multiple biological processes involved in cell growth, proliferation, and disease occurrence have been identified in recent years with the development of immunology, molecular biology, and genomics technologies. Biomarkers are capable of reflecting normal physiological processes, pathological processes, and the response to therapeutic intervention; as such, they play vital roles in disease diagnosis, prevention, drug response, and other aspects of biomedicine. The discovery of valuable biomarkers has become a focal point of current research. Numerous studies have identified molecular biomarkers based on the differential expression/concentration of molecules (e.g., genes/proteins) for disease state diagnosis, characterization, and treatment. Although technological breakthroughs in molecular analysis platforms have enabled the identification of a large number of candidate biomarkers for rare diseases, only a small number of these candidates have been properly validated for use in patient treatment. The traditional molecular biomarkers may lose vital information by ignoring molecular associations/interactions, and thus the concept of network biomarkers based on differential associations/correlations of molecule pairs has been established. This approach promises to be more stable and reliable in diagnosing disease states. Furthermore, the newly-emerged dynamic network biomarkers (DNBs) based on differential fluctuations/correlations of molecular groups are able to recognize pre-disease states or critical states instead of disease states, thereby achieving rare disease prediction or predictive/preventative medicine and providing deep insight into the dynamic characteristics of disease initiation and progression.

Indexed as

DiagnosisDynamic network biomarkerMolecular biomarkerNetwork biomarkerPredictionPrognosisRare disease

Identifiers

PMID38933388
PMCPMC11197705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.