Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38933320›Full record

ArticleTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2024

Analysis of bronchiectasis patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in a tertiary thoracic surgery center: Ten years of experience.

Koray Aydoğdu, Mehmet Çetin, Emre Yılmaz, Şevki Mustafa Demiröz, İlteriş Türk, Funda İncekara, Ali Alagöz, Göktürk Fındık

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Koray AydoğduDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1379-2855
Mehmet ÇetinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5471-2239
Emre YılmazDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5515-0079
Şevki Mustafa DemirözDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2471-6970
İlteriş TürkDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatoryum Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Funda İncekaraDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatoryum Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1788-4191
Ali AlagözDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatoryum Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7538-2213
Göktürk FındıkDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatoryum Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8861-7608

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to analyze our video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) experience in the surgical treatment of bronchiectasis and the reasons limiting VATS application. Methods: Two hundred one patients (106 males, 95 females; mean age: 39.7±14.1 years; range, 12 to 68 years) who underwent surgical treatment for bronchiectasis between January 2012 and October 2021 were included in the retrospective study. Three groups were created based on the surgical technique used: VATS, thoracotomy, and patients who were converted from VATS to thoracotomy. Results: The most significant presenting symptoms were cough (43%) and excessive sputum expectoration (40%). Surgical intervention was applied to the left side of 60% of the patients, and the most common resection performed in all three groups was left lower lobectomy. The rate of conversion from VATS to thoracotomy was 28.8%, and it was found that dense pleural adhesions were the most common reason. Revision surgery was performed on a total of 11 (5.47%) patients. The frequency of revision surgery did not differ significantly among the three groups (p=0.943). The most common postoperative complication was prolonged air leakage. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complication rates among the groups (p=0.417). The rate of surgical treatment of bronchiectasis with VATS was observed to have increased from 11.1% to 77.7% in our clinic. Conclusion: In experienced hands, VATS can be safely applied in the surgical treatment of bronchiectasis.

Indexed as

Bronchiectasisthoracotomyvideo-assisted thoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38933320
PMCPMC11197415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.