Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38933286›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference2024

Designing Communication Feedback Systems To Reduce Healthcare Providers' Implicit Biases In Patient Encounters.

Emily Bascom, Reggie Casanova-Perez, Kelly Tobar, Manas Satish Bedmutha, Harshini Ramaswamy, Wanda Pratt, Janice Sabin, Brian Wood, Nadir Weibel, Andrea Hartzler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Deploying and Examining Beacon for At-Home Patient Self-Monitoring with Critical Flicker Frequency.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. ConverSense: An Automated Approach to Assess Patient-Provider Interactions using Social Signals.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emily BascomInformation School, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Reggie Casanova-PerezBiomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kelly TobarUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Manas Satish BedmuthaUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Harshini RamaswamyUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Wanda PrattInformation School, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Janice SabinBiomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Brian WoodUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nadir WeibelComputer Science and Engineering & Design Lab, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Andrea HartzlerBiomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

University of Washington Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Research Training ProgramT15LM007442 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN H. GENNARI, Andrea L. Hartzler · 2002 to 2026
$19.6M
UnBIASED: Understanding Biased patient-provider Interaction And Supporting Enhanced DiscourseR01LM013301 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HARTZLER, ANDREA L. · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013301NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare providers' implicit bias, based on patients' physical characteristics and perceived identities, negatively impacts healthcare access, care quality, and outcomes. Feedback tools are needed to help providers identify and learn from their biases. To incorporate providers' perspectives on the most effective ways to present such feedback, we conducted semi-structured design critique sessions with 24 primary care providers. We found that providers seek feedback designed with transparent metrics indicating the quality of their communication with a patient and trends in communication patterns across visits. Based on these metrics and trends, providers want this feedback presented in a dashboard paired with actionable, personalized tips about how to improve their communication behaviors. Our study provides new insights for interactive systems to help mitigate the impact of implicit biases in patient-provider communication. New systems that build upon these insights could support providers in making healthcare more equitable, particularly for patients from marginalized communities.

Indexed as

Communication FeedbackHealthcareHealthcare ProvidersImlicit Bias

Identifiers

PMID38933286
PMCPMC11204363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.