Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38933227›Full record

ArticleHealth and human rights2024

Truth and Reconcilition Commissions and Health Care System Responses for Indigenous Peoples: A Scoping Review.

Sarah Larson, Cortez Standing Bear, Devon Olson, Nicole Redvers

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health and human rights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The relationship between Indigenous health and relevant sector Standards in Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and Canada: a scoping review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah LarsonGraduate with a focus on Indigenous health in the School of Medicine and Health Science at the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, United States.
Cortez Standing BearStudent specializing in population health research and analytics in the School of Medicine and Health Science at the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, United States.
Devon OlsonResearch and education librarian in the School of Medicine and Health Science at the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, United States.
Nicole RedversAssociate professor in the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, and an adjunct professor in the Department of Indigenous Health at the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grounded in human rights approaches, truth and reconciliation commissions (TRCs) explore an event or process that did widespread and systematic intentional harm to a group of people. Health as a fundamental right is an important component addressed by TRCs. Yet despite TRCs often having recommendations for health care systems, it is unknown how well these recommendations are being translated within health care settings. Therefore, the overarching purpose of our scoping review was to identify academic articles that discussed health care system discourse or responses to TRCs in the context of Indigenous Peoples. Our thematic analysis of the included articles identified three main themes for health care system responses to TRCs: (1) the acknowledgment of multiple ways of knowing, being, and doing in health systems; (2) current interventions as responses within health systems; and (3) suggestions for change within health systems. Although a TRC may create a specific road map and mandate for health care systems, we found considerable variability in the uptake of these actions across institutions. Concerted efforts within and around health care systems and across sectors are therefore necessary to achieve large-scale, meaningful change for Indigenous Peoples post-TRCs and to maintain accountability as a foundational human rights principle.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth Services, IndigenousHuman RightsIndigenous PeoplesHumans

Identifiers

PMID38933227
PMCPMC11197867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.